Skip to Content
Main content

MS 101 EDWARD R BYRNE GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

157
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 448

LEVEL 1

157

35%

LEVEL 2

134

30%

LEVEL 3

93

21%

LEVEL 4

64

14%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

173
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 452

LEVEL 1

120

27%

LEVEL 2

159

35%

LEVEL 3

96

21%

LEVEL 4

77

17%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

80
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

70

31%

LEVEL 2

73

33%

LEVEL 3

47

21%

LEVEL 4

33

15%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

93
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

57

24%

LEVEL 2

87

37%

LEVEL 3

46

19%

LEVEL 4

47

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

77
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

87

39%

LEVEL 2

61

27%

LEVEL 3

46

20%

LEVEL 4

31

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

80
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

63

29%

LEVEL 2

72

33%

LEVEL 3

50

23%

LEVEL 4

30

14%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

52
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

3

4%

LEVEL 2

12

18%

LEVEL 3

24

36%

LEVEL 4

28

42%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

53
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

2

3%

LEVEL 2

9

14%

LEVEL 3

20

31%

LEVEL 4

33

52%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

24
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

29

35%

LEVEL 2

31

37%

LEVEL 3

15

18%

LEVEL 4

9

11%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

26
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

20

24%

LEVEL 2

37

45%

LEVEL 3

17

20%

LEVEL 4

9

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

14
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

20

43%

LEVEL 2

13

28%

LEVEL 3

11

23%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

11
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

14

33%

LEVEL 2

17

40%

LEVEL 3

7

17%

LEVEL 4

4

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

64
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

104

42%

LEVEL 2

77

31%

LEVEL 3

42

17%

LEVEL 4

22

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

77
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

82

32%

LEVEL 2

94

37%

LEVEL 3

50

20%

LEVEL 4

27

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

154
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 362

LEVEL 1

95

26%

LEVEL 2

113

31%

LEVEL 3

91

25%

LEVEL 4

63

17%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

168
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 370

LEVEL 1

71

19%

LEVEL 2

131

35%

LEVEL 3

91

25%

LEVEL 4

77

21%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

62

72%

LEVEL 2

21

24%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

49

60%

LEVEL 2

28

34%

LEVEL 3

5

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

157
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 442

LEVEL 1

152

34%

LEVEL 2

133

30%

LEVEL 3

93

21%

LEVEL 4

64

14%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

5

83%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

60
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

51

33%

LEVEL 2

45

29%

LEVEL 3

38

24%

LEVEL 4

22

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

64
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

34

23%

LEVEL 2

52

35%

LEVEL 3

38

25%

LEVEL 4

26

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

97
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

106

36%

LEVEL 2

89

30%

LEVEL 3

55

19%

LEVEL 4

42

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

109
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

86

28%

LEVEL 2

107

35%

LEVEL 3

58

19%

LEVEL 4

51

17%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.