Skip to Content
Main content

JHS 143 ELEANOR ROOSEVELT GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

22
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 326

LEVEL 1

231

71%

LEVEL 2

73

22%

LEVEL 3

18

6%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

19
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

202

68%

LEVEL 2

78

26%

LEVEL 3

18

6%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

7
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

94

73%

LEVEL 2

28

22%

LEVEL 3

7

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

8
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

82

67%

LEVEL 2

33

27%

LEVEL 3

8

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MALE

PROFICIENT

15
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

137

70%

LEVEL 2

45

23%

LEVEL 3

11

6%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

11
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

120

68%

LEVEL 2

45

26%

LEVEL 3

10

6%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

20
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

224

72%

LEVEL 2

69

22%

LEVEL 3

18

6%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

18
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

190

67%

LEVEL 2

75

27%

LEVEL 3

17

6%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

20
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

175

67%

LEVEL 2

68

26%

LEVEL 3

17

6%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

17
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

158

64%

LEVEL 2

72

29%

LEVEL 3

16

6%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

56

89%

LEVEL 2

5

8%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

44

85%

LEVEL 2

6

12%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

22
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

79

50%

LEVEL 2

56

36%

LEVEL 3

18

11%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

18
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

58

45%

LEVEL 2

54

42%

LEVEL 3

17

13%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

152

90%

LEVEL 2

17

10%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

144

85%

LEVEL 2

24

14%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

9
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

64

67%

LEVEL 2

22

23%

LEVEL 3

6

6%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

74

76%

LEVEL 2

15

15%

LEVEL 3

8

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

13
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

167

72%

LEVEL 2

51

22%

LEVEL 3

12

5%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

128

63%

LEVEL 2

63

31%

LEVEL 3

10

5%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.