Skip to Content
Main content

MS 245 COMPUTER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

174
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

14

5%

LEVEL 2

89

32%

LEVEL 3

92

33%

LEVEL 4

82

30%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

169
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 282

LEVEL 1

28

10%

LEVEL 2

85

30%

LEVEL 3

73

26%

LEVEL 4

96

34%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

98
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

7

4%

LEVEL 2

52

33%

LEVEL 3

52

33%

LEVEL 4

46

29%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

88
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

18

12%

LEVEL 2

49

32%

LEVEL 3

40

26%

LEVEL 4

48

31%

MALE

PROFICIENT

76
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

7

6%

LEVEL 2

37

31%

LEVEL 3

40

33%

LEVEL 4

36

30%

MALE

PROFICIENT

81
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

10

8%

LEVEL 2

36

28%

LEVEL 3

33

26%

LEVEL 4

48

38%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

3

30%

LEVEL 4

3

30%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

4
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

3

60%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

9
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

31%

LEVEL 3

4

31%

LEVEL 4

5

38%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

12
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

6

46%

LEVEL 4

6

46%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

102
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

4

3%

LEVEL 2

33

24%

LEVEL 3

52

37%

LEVEL 4

50

36%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

98
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

7

5%

LEVEL 2

36

26%

LEVEL 3

37

26%

LEVEL 4

61

43%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

16
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

4

12%

LEVEL 2

13

39%

LEVEL 3

9

27%

LEVEL 4

7

21%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

16
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

7

23%

LEVEL 2

7

23%

LEVEL 3

10

33%

LEVEL 4

6

20%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

37
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

6

8%

LEVEL 2

34

44%

LEVEL 3

21

27%

LEVEL 4

16

21%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

37
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

14

17%

LEVEL 2

33

39%

LEVEL 3

19

23%

LEVEL 4

18

21%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

161
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

63

28%

LEVEL 3

81

36%

LEVEL 4

80

35%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

161
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

9

4%

LEVEL 2

62

27%

LEVEL 3

66

28%

LEVEL 4

95

41%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

11

22%

LEVEL 2

26

52%

LEVEL 3

11

22%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

19

38%

LEVEL 2

23

46%

LEVEL 3

7

14%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

170
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

12

4%

LEVEL 2

87

32%

LEVEL 3

91

34%

LEVEL 4

79

29%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

3

38%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

139
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

5

2%

LEVEL 2

63

30%

LEVEL 3

70

34%

LEVEL 4

69

33%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

130
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

17

8%

LEVEL 2

63

30%

LEVEL 3

51

24%

LEVEL 4

79

38%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

9

13%

LEVEL 2

26

37%

LEVEL 3

22

31%

LEVEL 4

13

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

39
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

11

15%

LEVEL 2

22

31%

LEVEL 3

22

31%

LEVEL 4

17

24%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.