PS 9 SARAH ANDERSON GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

233
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 275

LEVEL 1

6

2%

LEVEL 2

36

13%

LEVEL 3

69

25%

LEVEL 4

164

60%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

223
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

8

3%

LEVEL 2

28

11%

LEVEL 3

74

29%

LEVEL 4

149

58%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

125
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

21

14%

LEVEL 3

27

18%

LEVEL 4

98

66%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

117
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

14

11%

LEVEL 3

30

23%

LEVEL 4

87

65%

MALE

PROFICIENT

108
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

15

12%

LEVEL 3

42

33%

LEVEL 4

66

52%

MALE

PROFICIENT

106
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

6

5%

LEVEL 2

14

11%

LEVEL 3

44

35%

LEVEL 4

62

49%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

16
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

5

31%

LEVEL 4

11

69%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

28
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

3%

LEVEL 3

6

21%

LEVEL 4

22

76%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

23
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

8%

LEVEL 3

5

20%

LEVEL 4

18

72%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

150
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

16

10%

LEVEL 3

40

24%

LEVEL 4

110

65%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

139
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

5

3%

LEVEL 2

7

5%

LEVEL 3

41

27%

LEVEL 4

98

65%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

4

44%

LEVEL 4

3

33%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

41
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

4

7%

LEVEL 2

16

26%

LEVEL 3

19

31%

LEVEL 4

22

36%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

36
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

2

4%

LEVEL 2

16

30%

LEVEL 3

19

35%

LEVEL 4

17

31%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

210
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

21

9%

LEVEL 3

55

24%

LEVEL 4

155

67%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

196
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

13

6%

LEVEL 3

52

25%

LEVEL 4

144

68%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

23
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

4

10%

LEVEL 2

15

36%

LEVEL 3

14

33%

LEVEL 4

9

21%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

27
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

6

13%

LEVEL 2

15

31%

LEVEL 3

22

46%

LEVEL 4

5

10%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

217
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

8

3%

LEVEL 2

27

11%

LEVEL 3

69

27%

LEVEL 4

148

59%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

6
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

5

71%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

193
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

14

7%

LEVEL 3

47

23%

LEVEL 4

146

70%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

191
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

7

4%

LEVEL 3

56

28%

LEVEL 4

135

68%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

40
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

5

7%

LEVEL 2

22

33%

LEVEL 3

22

33%

LEVEL 4

18

27%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

6

10%

LEVEL 2

21

36%

LEVEL 3

18

31%

LEVEL 4

14

24%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.