Skip to Content
Main content

PS 234 INDEPENDENCE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

233
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

24

8%

LEVEL 2

43

14%

LEVEL 3

108

36%

LEVEL 4

125

42%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

236
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

16

5%

LEVEL 2

49

16%

LEVEL 3

103

34%

LEVEL 4

133

44%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

121
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

8

5%

LEVEL 2

21

14%

LEVEL 3

65

43%

LEVEL 4

56

37%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

111
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

9

6%

LEVEL 2

23

16%

LEVEL 3

48

34%

LEVEL 4

63

44%

MALE

PROFICIENT

112
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

16

11%

LEVEL 2

22

15%

LEVEL 3

43

29%

LEVEL 4

69

46%

MALE

PROFICIENT

125
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

7

4%

LEVEL 2

26

16%

LEVEL 3

55

35%

LEVEL 4

70

44%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

25
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

7%

LEVEL 3

13

48%

LEVEL 4

12

44%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

27
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

6

18%

LEVEL 3

7

21%

LEVEL 4

20

59%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

26
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

2

6%

LEVEL 2

3

10%

LEVEL 3

9

29%

LEVEL 4

17

55%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

25
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

19%

LEVEL 3

11

35%

LEVEL 4

14

45%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

170
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

15

7%

LEVEL 2

30

14%

LEVEL 3

78

36%

LEVEL 4

92

43%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

166
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

13

6%

LEVEL 2

30

14%

LEVEL 3

76

36%

LEVEL 4

90

43%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

209
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

6

2%

LEVEL 2

26

11%

LEVEL 3

90

37%

LEVEL 4

119

49%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

213
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

32

13%

LEVEL 3

89

36%

LEVEL 4

124

50%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

24
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

18

31%

LEVEL 2

17

29%

LEVEL 3

18

31%

LEVEL 4

6

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

23
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

14

26%

LEVEL 2

17

31%

LEVEL 3

14

26%

LEVEL 4

9

17%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

229
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

19

7%

LEVEL 2

43

15%

LEVEL 3

105

36%

LEVEL 4

124

43%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

232
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

15

5%

LEVEL 2

45

15%

LEVEL 3

101

35%

LEVEL 4

131

45%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

5

56%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

2

22%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.