Skip to Content
Main content

H B THOMPSON MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

210
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

47

18%

LEVEL 3

75

29%

LEVEL 4

135

52%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

241
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

9

3%

LEVEL 2

60

19%

LEVEL 3

103

33%

LEVEL 4

138

45%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

100
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

27

21%

LEVEL 3

36

28%

LEVEL 4

64

50%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

121
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

39

24%

LEVEL 3

52

32%

LEVEL 4

69

42%

MALE

PROFICIENT

110
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

20

15%

LEVEL 3

39

30%

LEVEL 4

71

54%

MALE

PROFICIENT

120
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

5

3%

LEVEL 2

21

14%

LEVEL 3

51

35%

LEVEL 4

69

47%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

129
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

15

10%

LEVEL 3

39

27%

LEVEL 4

90

62%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

129
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

4

3%

LEVEL 2

24

15%

LEVEL 3

49

31%

LEVEL 4

80

51%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

75
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

30

28%

LEVEL 3

33

31%

LEVEL 4

42

39%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

99
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

4

3%

LEVEL 2

33

24%

LEVEL 3

47

35%

LEVEL 4

52

38%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

1

9%

LEVEL 2

2

18%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

5

45%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

204
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

43

17%

LEVEL 3

71

29%

LEVEL 4

133

53%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

233
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

4

1%

LEVEL 2

51

18%

LEVEL 3

96

33%

LEVEL 4

137

48%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

1

9%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

4

36%

LEVEL 4

2

18%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

5

23%

LEVEL 2

9

41%

LEVEL 3

7

32%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

237
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

7

2%

LEVEL 2

57

19%

LEVEL 3

100

33%

LEVEL 4

137

46%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

197
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

42

17%

LEVEL 3

67

28%

LEVEL 4

130

54%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

225
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

8

3%

LEVEL 2

56

19%

LEVEL 3

92

32%

LEVEL 4

133

46%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

13
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

5

26%

LEVEL 3

8

42%

LEVEL 4

5

26%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

16
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

4

19%

LEVEL 3

11

52%

LEVEL 4

5

24%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.