BARNUM WOODS SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

123
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

4

3%

LEVEL 2

14

10%

LEVEL 3

52

37%

LEVEL 4

71

50%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

102
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

8

7%

LEVEL 3

41

37%

LEVEL 4

61

55%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

58
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

4

6%

LEVEL 2

9

13%

LEVEL 3

23

32%

LEVEL 4

35

49%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

52
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

2

4%

LEVEL 3

24

44%

LEVEL 4

28

51%

MALE

PROFICIENT

65
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

7%

LEVEL 3

29

41%

LEVEL 4

36

51%

MALE

PROFICIENT

50
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

11%

LEVEL 3

17

30%

LEVEL 4

33

59%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

36
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

2

5%

LEVEL 3

13

33%

LEVEL 4

23

59%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

31
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

11%

LEVEL 3

15

43%

LEVEL 4

16

46%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

53
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

2

3%

LEVEL 2

6

10%

LEVEL 3

19

31%

LEVEL 4

34

56%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

50
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

3

6%

LEVEL 3

17

31%

LEVEL 4

33

61%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

21
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

22%

LEVEL 3

12

44%

LEVEL 4

9

33%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

15
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

6%

LEVEL 3

6

38%

LEVEL 4

9

56%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

120
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

12

9%

LEVEL 3

50

37%

LEVEL 4

70

52%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

99
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

4

4%

LEVEL 2

9

8%

LEVEL 3

41

37%

LEVEL 4

58

52%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

84
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

7

8%

LEVEL 3

32

35%

LEVEL 4

52

57%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

17%

LEVEL 3

11

38%

LEVEL 4

13

45%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

18
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

5%

LEVEL 3

9

47%

LEVEL 4

9

47%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.