Skip to Content
Main content

FONDA-FULTONVILLE CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

209
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 472

LEVEL 1

94

20%

LEVEL 2

169

36%

LEVEL 3

130

28%

LEVEL 4

79

17%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

234
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 493

LEVEL 1

84

17%

LEVEL 2

175

35%

LEVEL 3

157

32%

LEVEL 4

77

16%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

108
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

38

16%

LEVEL 2

88

38%

LEVEL 3

67

29%

LEVEL 4

41

18%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

117
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

41

16%

LEVEL 2

97

38%

LEVEL 3

81

32%

LEVEL 4

36

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

101
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

56

24%

LEVEL 2

81

34%

LEVEL 3

63

26%

LEVEL 4

38

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

117
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

43

18%

LEVEL 2

78

33%

LEVEL 3

76

32%

LEVEL 4

41

17%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

3

25%

LEVEL 2

5

42%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

2

17%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

4

50%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

197
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 443

LEVEL 1

84

19%

LEVEL 2

162

37%

LEVEL 3

121

27%

LEVEL 4

76

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

221
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 460

LEVEL 1

74

16%

LEVEL 2

165

36%

LEVEL 3

149

32%

LEVEL 4

72

16%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

7

54%

LEVEL 2

3

23%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

5

45%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

206
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 422

LEVEL 1

60

14%

LEVEL 2

156

37%

LEVEL 3

128

30%

LEVEL 4

78

18%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

228
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 435

LEVEL 1

54

12%

LEVEL 2

153

35%

LEVEL 3

151

35%

LEVEL 4

77

18%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

34

68%

LEVEL 2

13

26%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

30

52%

LEVEL 2

22

38%

LEVEL 3

6

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

156
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

30

11%

LEVEL 2

93

33%

LEVEL 3

93

33%

LEVEL 4

63

23%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

163
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

37

12%

LEVEL 2

102

34%

LEVEL 3

105

35%

LEVEL 4

58

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

53
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

64

33%

LEVEL 2

76

39%

LEVEL 3

37

19%

LEVEL 4

16

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

71
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

47

25%

LEVEL 2

73

38%

LEVEL 3

52

27%

LEVEL 4

19

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.