Skip to Content
Main content

RONALD L SODOMA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

104
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 354

LEVEL 1

140

40%

LEVEL 2

110

31%

LEVEL 3

78

22%

LEVEL 4

26

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

127
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 383

LEVEL 1

137

36%

LEVEL 2

119

31%

LEVEL 3

82

21%

LEVEL 4

45

12%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

50
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

70

40%

LEVEL 2

56

32%

LEVEL 3

39

22%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

47
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

69

38%

LEVEL 2

67

37%

LEVEL 3

33

18%

LEVEL 4

14

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

54
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

70

39%

LEVEL 2

54

30%

LEVEL 3

39

22%

LEVEL 4

15

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

80
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

68

34%

LEVEL 2

52

26%

LEVEL 3

49

25%

LEVEL 4

31

16%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

84
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

94

35%

LEVEL 2

89

33%

LEVEL 3

64

24%

LEVEL 4

20

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

104
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

95

33%

LEVEL 2

93

32%

LEVEL 3

68

23%

LEVEL 4

36

12%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

17

59%

LEVEL 2

6

21%

LEVEL 3

6

21%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

19

54%

LEVEL 2

7

20%

LEVEL 3

6

17%

LEVEL 4

3

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

25

49%

LEVEL 2

15

29%

LEVEL 3

8

16%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

21

45%

LEVEL 2

18

38%

LEVEL 3

5

11%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

103
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 324

LEVEL 1

113

35%

LEVEL 2

108

33%

LEVEL 3

77

24%

LEVEL 4

26

8%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

127
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 342

LEVEL 1

103

30%

LEVEL 2

112

33%

LEVEL 3

82

24%

LEVEL 4

45

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

27

90%

LEVEL 2

2

7%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

34

83%

LEVEL 2

7

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

103
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 340

LEVEL 1

130

38%

LEVEL 2

107

31%

LEVEL 3

77

23%

LEVEL 4

26

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

125
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 368

LEVEL 1

127

35%

LEVEL 2

116

32%

LEVEL 3

80

22%

LEVEL 4

45

12%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

10

71%

LEVEL 2

3

21%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

10

67%

LEVEL 2

3

20%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

59
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

29

23%

LEVEL 2

40

31%

LEVEL 3

44

34%

LEVEL 4

15

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

72
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

30

20%

LEVEL 2

48

32%

LEVEL 3

45

30%

LEVEL 4

27

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

45
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

111

49%

LEVEL 2

70

31%

LEVEL 3

34

15%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

55
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

107

46%

LEVEL 2

71

30%

LEVEL 3

37

16%

LEVEL 4

18

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

102
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 340

LEVEL 1

134

39%

LEVEL 2

104

31%

LEVEL 3

76

22%

LEVEL 4

26

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

125
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 376

LEVEL 1

133

35%

LEVEL 2

118

31%

LEVEL 3

81

22%

LEVEL 4

44

12%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

2
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

6

43%

LEVEL 2

6

43%

LEVEL 3

2

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

4

57%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.