Skip to Content
Main content

CAZENOVIA CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

267
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 442

LEVEL 1

43

10%

LEVEL 2

132

30%

LEVEL 3

134

30%

LEVEL 4

133

30%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

264
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 467

LEVEL 1

47

10%

LEVEL 2

156

33%

LEVEL 3

143

31%

LEVEL 4

121

26%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

146
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

25

11%

LEVEL 2

66

28%

LEVEL 3

71

30%

LEVEL 4

75

32%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

140
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

25

11%

LEVEL 2

70

30%

LEVEL 3

67

29%

LEVEL 4

73

31%

MALE

PROFICIENT

121
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

18

9%

LEVEL 2

66

32%

LEVEL 3

63

31%

LEVEL 4

58

28%

MALE

PROFICIENT

124
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

22

9%

LEVEL 2

86

37%

LEVEL 3

76

33%

LEVEL 4

48

21%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

3

50%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

5

63%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

254
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 416

LEVEL 1

39

9%

LEVEL 2

123

30%

LEVEL 3

129

31%

LEVEL 4

125

30%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

250
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 441

LEVEL 1

47

11%

LEVEL 2

144

33%

LEVEL 3

137

31%

LEVEL 4

113

26%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

50%

LEVEL 3

3

30%

LEVEL 4

2

20%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

2

22%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

265
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 405

LEVEL 1

24

6%

LEVEL 2

116

29%

LEVEL 3

132

33%

LEVEL 4

133

33%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

261
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 426

LEVEL 1

28

7%

LEVEL 2

137

32%

LEVEL 3

140

33%

LEVEL 4

121

28%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

19

51%

LEVEL 2

16

43%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

19

46%

LEVEL 2

19

46%

LEVEL 3

3

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

227
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 341

LEVEL 1

19

6%

LEVEL 2

95

28%

LEVEL 3

112

33%

LEVEL 4

115

34%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

228
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 361

LEVEL 1

22

6%

LEVEL 2

111

31%

LEVEL 3

118

33%

LEVEL 4

110

30%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

40
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

24

24%

LEVEL 2

37

37%

LEVEL 3

22

22%

LEVEL 4

18

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

36
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

25

24%

LEVEL 2

45

42%

LEVEL 3

25

24%

LEVEL 4

11

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.