WAYLAND-COHOCTON CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

219
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 470

LEVEL 1

87

19%

LEVEL 2

164

35%

LEVEL 3

135

29%

LEVEL 4

84

18%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

199
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 452

LEVEL 1

89

20%

LEVEL 2

164

36%

LEVEL 3

118

26%

LEVEL 4

81

18%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

102
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

39

17%

LEVEL 2

86

38%

LEVEL 3

64

28%

LEVEL 4

38

17%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

96
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

40

18%

LEVEL 2

81

37%

LEVEL 3

52

24%

LEVEL 4

44

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

117
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

48

20%

LEVEL 2

78

32%

LEVEL 3

71

29%

LEVEL 4

46

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

103
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

49

21%

LEVEL 2

83

35%

LEVEL 3

66

28%

LEVEL 4

37

16%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

214
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 454

LEVEL 1

83

18%

LEVEL 2

157

35%

LEVEL 3

132

29%

LEVEL 4

82

18%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

193
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 437

LEVEL 1

85

19%

LEVEL 2

159

36%

LEVEL 3

116

27%

LEVEL 4

77

18%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

86%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

213
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 412

LEVEL 1

47

11%

LEVEL 2

152

37%

LEVEL 3

129

31%

LEVEL 4

84

20%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

195
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 391

LEVEL 1

49

13%

LEVEL 2

147

38%

LEVEL 3

115

29%

LEVEL 4

80

20%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

40

69%

LEVEL 2

12

21%

LEVEL 3

6

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

40

66%

LEVEL 2

17

28%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

114
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

20

10%

LEVEL 2

59

31%

LEVEL 3

67

35%

LEVEL 4

47

24%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

106
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

28

14%

LEVEL 2

63

32%

LEVEL 3

62

31%

LEVEL 4

44

22%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

105
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

67

24%

LEVEL 2

105

38%

LEVEL 3

68

25%

LEVEL 4

37

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

93
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

61

24%

LEVEL 2

101

40%

LEVEL 3

56

22%

LEVEL 4

37

15%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.