Skip to Content
Main content

CARTHAGE MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

191
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 676

LEVEL 1

215

32%

LEVEL 2

270

40%

LEVEL 3

122

18%

LEVEL 4

69

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

229
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 693

LEVEL 1

223

32%

LEVEL 2

241

35%

LEVEL 3

173

25%

LEVEL 4

56

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

98
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

108

32%

LEVEL 2

130

39%

LEVEL 3

58

17%

LEVEL 4

40

12%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

113
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 341

LEVEL 1

103

30%

LEVEL 2

125

37%

LEVEL 3

91

27%

LEVEL 4

22

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

93
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 340

LEVEL 1

107

31%

LEVEL 2

140

41%

LEVEL 3

64

19%

LEVEL 4

29

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

116
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 352

LEVEL 1

120

34%

LEVEL 2

116

33%

LEVEL 3

82

23%

LEVEL 4

34

10%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

17
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

15

24%

LEVEL 2

30

48%

LEVEL 3

10

16%

LEVEL 4

7

11%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

15
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

13

26%

LEVEL 2

22

44%

LEVEL 3

13

26%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

149
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 476

LEVEL 1

154

32%

LEVEL 2

173

36%

LEVEL 3

92

19%

LEVEL 4

57

12%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

175
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 524

LEVEL 1

175

33%

LEVEL 2

174

33%

LEVEL 3

127

24%

LEVEL 4

48

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

21

44%

LEVEL 2

21

44%

LEVEL 3

5

10%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

11
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

13

38%

LEVEL 2

10

29%

LEVEL 3

11

32%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

17
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

21

28%

LEVEL 2

37

49%

LEVEL 3

14

19%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

23
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

17

25%

LEVEL 2

28

41%

LEVEL 3

18

26%

LEVEL 4

5

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

223
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 576

LEVEL 1

129

22%

LEVEL 2

224

39%

LEVEL 3

167

29%

LEVEL 4

56

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

94

80%

LEVEL 2

17

15%

LEVEL 3

6

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

128
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 345

LEVEL 1

77

22%

LEVEL 2

140

41%

LEVEL 3

76

22%

LEVEL 4

52

15%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

156
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 359

LEVEL 1

86

24%

LEVEL 2

117

33%

LEVEL 3

111

31%

LEVEL 4

45

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

63
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 331

LEVEL 1

138

42%

LEVEL 2

130

39%

LEVEL 3

46

14%

LEVEL 4

17

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

73
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 334

LEVEL 1

137

41%

LEVEL 2

124

37%

LEVEL 3

62

19%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.