GENERAL BROWN CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

268
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 606

LEVEL 1

104

17%

LEVEL 2

234

39%

LEVEL 3

164

27%

LEVEL 4

104

17%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

268
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 614

LEVEL 1

125

20%

LEVEL 2

221

36%

LEVEL 3

180

29%

LEVEL 4

88

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

134
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

45

16%

LEVEL 2

108

38%

LEVEL 3

86

30%

LEVEL 4

48

17%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

135
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

59

20%

LEVEL 2

97

33%

LEVEL 3

92

32%

LEVEL 4

43

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

134
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 319

LEVEL 1

59

18%

LEVEL 2

126

39%

LEVEL 3

78

24%

LEVEL 4

56

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

133
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 323

LEVEL 1

66

20%

LEVEL 2

124

38%

LEVEL 3

88

27%

LEVEL 4

45

14%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

3

50%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

251
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 574

LEVEL 1

101

18%

LEVEL 2

222

39%

LEVEL 3

154

27%

LEVEL 4

97

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

251
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 578

LEVEL 1

117

20%

LEVEL 2

210

36%

LEVEL 3

167

29%

LEVEL 4

84

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

1

9%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

4

36%

LEVEL 4

2

18%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

7

78%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

6

50%

LEVEL 2

2

17%

LEVEL 3

4

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

259
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 501

LEVEL 1

47

9%

LEVEL 2

195

39%

LEVEL 3

155

31%

LEVEL 4

104

21%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

257
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 513

LEVEL 1

69

13%

LEVEL 2

187

36%

LEVEL 3

172

34%

LEVEL 4

85

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

57

54%

LEVEL 2

39

37%

LEVEL 3

9

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

56

55%

LEVEL 2

34

34%

LEVEL 3

8

8%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

189
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 349

LEVEL 1

39

11%

LEVEL 2

121

35%

LEVEL 3

109

31%

LEVEL 4

80

23%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

185
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 362

LEVEL 1

55

15%

LEVEL 2

122

34%

LEVEL 3

115

32%

LEVEL 4

70

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

79
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

65

25%

LEVEL 2

113

44%

LEVEL 3

55

21%

LEVEL 4

24

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

83
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

70

28%

LEVEL 2

99

39%

LEVEL 3

65

26%

LEVEL 4

18

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.