GREENVILLE CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

71
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

75

34%

LEVEL 2

77

35%

LEVEL 3

40

18%

LEVEL 4

31

14%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

75
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

78

32%

LEVEL 2

90

37%

LEVEL 3

56

23%

LEVEL 4

19

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

34
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

35

33%

LEVEL 2

38

36%

LEVEL 3

18

17%

LEVEL 4

16

15%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

36
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

39

33%

LEVEL 2

42

36%

LEVEL 3

26

22%

LEVEL 4

10

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

37
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

40

34%

LEVEL 2

39

34%

LEVEL 3

22

19%

LEVEL 4

15

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

39
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

39

31%

LEVEL 2

48

38%

LEVEL 3

30

24%

LEVEL 4

9

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

3

60%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

67
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

68

33%

LEVEL 2

72

35%

LEVEL 3

39

19%

LEVEL 4

28

14%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

71
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

71

31%

LEVEL 2

84

37%

LEVEL 3

53

23%

LEVEL 4

18

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

80%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

5

83%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

5

71%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

71
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

40

22%

LEVEL 2

75

40%

LEVEL 3

40

22%

LEVEL 4

31

17%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

75
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

49

23%

LEVEL 2

89

42%

LEVEL 3

56

26%

LEVEL 4

19

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

35

95%

LEVEL 2

2

5%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

29

97%

LEVEL 2

1

3%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

57
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

35

26%

LEVEL 2

43

32%

LEVEL 3

31

23%

LEVEL 4

26

19%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

59
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

45

27%

LEVEL 2

60

37%

LEVEL 3

42

26%

LEVEL 4

17

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

14
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

40

45%

LEVEL 2

34

39%

LEVEL 3

9

10%

LEVEL 4

5

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

16
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

33

42%

LEVEL 2

30

38%

LEVEL 3

14

18%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.