Skip to Content
Main content

BROADALBIN-PERTH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

145
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

51

17%

LEVEL 2

105

35%

LEVEL 3

84

28%

LEVEL 4

61

20%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

184
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

52

16%

LEVEL 2

80

25%

LEVEL 3

119

38%

LEVEL 4

65

21%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

60
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

30

21%

LEVEL 2

54

38%

LEVEL 3

32

22%

LEVEL 4

28

19%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

89
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

25

16%

LEVEL 2

40

26%

LEVEL 3

61

40%

LEVEL 4

28

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

85
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

21

13%

LEVEL 2

51

32%

LEVEL 3

52

33%

LEVEL 4

33

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

95
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

27

17%

LEVEL 2

40

25%

LEVEL 3

58

36%

LEVEL 4

37

23%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

141
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

49

17%

LEVEL 2

95

33%

LEVEL 3

81

28%

LEVEL 4

60

21%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

176
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

48

16%

LEVEL 2

76

25%

LEVEL 3

112

37%

LEVEL 4

64

21%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

83%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

141
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

37

14%

LEVEL 2

94

35%

LEVEL 3

81

30%

LEVEL 4

60

22%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

182
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

36

12%

LEVEL 2

74

25%

LEVEL 3

118

40%

LEVEL 4

64

22%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

14

48%

LEVEL 2

11

38%

LEVEL 3

3

10%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

16

67%

LEVEL 2

6

25%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

102
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

16

10%

LEVEL 2

48

29%

LEVEL 3

52

31%

LEVEL 4

50

30%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

127
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

11

6%

LEVEL 2

37

21%

LEVEL 3

79

45%

LEVEL 4

48

27%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

35

26%

LEVEL 2

57

42%

LEVEL 3

32

24%

LEVEL 4

11

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

57
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

41

29%

LEVEL 2

43

30%

LEVEL 3

40

28%

LEVEL 4

17

12%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.