ST REGIS FALLS CENTRAL SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

17
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

24

37%

LEVEL 2

24

37%

LEVEL 3

10

15%

LEVEL 4

7

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

21
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

45

46%

LEVEL 2

32

33%

LEVEL 3

19

19%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

14
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

8

22%

LEVEL 2

14

39%

LEVEL 3

8

22%

LEVEL 4

6

17%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

14
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

20

39%

LEVEL 2

17

33%

LEVEL 3

12

24%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

3
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

16

55%

LEVEL 2

10

34%

LEVEL 3

2

7%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

7
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

25

53%

LEVEL 2

15

32%

LEVEL 3

7

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

15
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

24

40%

LEVEL 2

21

35%

LEVEL 3

9

15%

LEVEL 4

6

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

18
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

43

48%

LEVEL 2

29

32%

LEVEL 3

16

18%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

16
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

13

25%

LEVEL 2

23

44%

LEVEL 3

9

17%

LEVEL 4

7

13%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

21
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

22

30%

LEVEL 2

30

41%

LEVEL 3

19

26%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

11

85%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

23

92%

LEVEL 2

2

8%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

5

24%

LEVEL 2

8

38%

LEVEL 3

5

24%

LEVEL 4

3

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

14
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

6

18%

LEVEL 2

13

39%

LEVEL 3

12

36%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

9
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

19

43%

LEVEL 2

16

36%

LEVEL 3

5

11%

LEVEL 4

4

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

39

60%

LEVEL 2

19

29%

LEVEL 3

7

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.