MORIAH CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

105
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

77

26%

LEVEL 2

117

39%

LEVEL 3

62

21%

LEVEL 4

43

14%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

121
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

83

27%

LEVEL 2

109

35%

LEVEL 3

74

24%

LEVEL 4

47

15%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

50
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

39

27%

LEVEL 2

56

39%

LEVEL 3

28

19%

LEVEL 4

22

15%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

58
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

44

30%

LEVEL 2

45

31%

LEVEL 3

37

25%

LEVEL 4

21

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

55
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

38

25%

LEVEL 2

61

40%

LEVEL 3

34

22%

LEVEL 4

21

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

63
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

39

23%

LEVEL 2

64

39%

LEVEL 3

37

22%

LEVEL 4

26

16%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

120
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 306

LEVEL 1

81

26%

LEVEL 2

105

34%

LEVEL 3

73

24%

LEVEL 4

47

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

96
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

23

11%

LEVEL 2

100

46%

LEVEL 3

56

26%

LEVEL 4

40

18%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

115
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

31

13%

LEVEL 2

89

38%

LEVEL 3

71

30%

LEVEL 4

44

19%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

54

68%

LEVEL 2

17

21%

LEVEL 3

6

8%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

52

67%

LEVEL 2

20

26%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

68
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

10

8%

LEVEL 2

50

39%

LEVEL 3

34

27%

LEVEL 4

34

27%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

79
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

20

14%

LEVEL 2

45

31%

LEVEL 3

43

30%

LEVEL 4

36

25%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

37
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

67

39%

LEVEL 2

67

39%

LEVEL 3

28

16%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

42
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

63

37%

LEVEL 2

64

38%

LEVEL 3

31

18%

LEVEL 4

11

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.