HERBERT HOOVER MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

73
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

77

28%

LEVEL 2

130

46%

LEVEL 3

44

16%

LEVEL 4

29

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

162
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 436

LEVEL 1

119

27%

LEVEL 2

155

36%

LEVEL 3

110

25%

LEVEL 4

52

12%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

32
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

35

30%

LEVEL 2

50

43%

LEVEL 3

19

16%

LEVEL 4

13

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

86
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

55

26%

LEVEL 2

73

34%

LEVEL 3

61

29%

LEVEL 4

25

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

41
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

42

26%

LEVEL 2

80

49%

LEVEL 3

25

15%

LEVEL 4

16

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

76
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

64

29%

LEVEL 2

82

37%

LEVEL 3

49

22%

LEVEL 4

27

12%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

9

64%

LEVEL 2

1

7%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

3

21%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

80%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

2

20%

LEVEL 2

6

60%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

69
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

49

23%

LEVEL 2

96

45%

LEVEL 3

40

19%

LEVEL 4

29

14%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

137
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

78

23%

LEVEL 2

121

36%

LEVEL 3

90

27%

LEVEL 4

47

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

7

35%

LEVEL 2

13

65%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

16

48%

LEVEL 2

12

36%

LEVEL 3

4

12%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

15

65%

LEVEL 2

8

35%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

13

35%

LEVEL 2

14

38%

LEVEL 3

9

24%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

69
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

42

19%

LEVEL 2

111

50%

LEVEL 3

41

18%

LEVEL 4

28

13%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

158
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 375

LEVEL 1

78

21%

LEVEL 2

139

37%

LEVEL 3

108

29%

LEVEL 4

50

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

35

60%

LEVEL 2

19

33%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

41

67%

LEVEL 2

16

26%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

73
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

71

26%

LEVEL 2

127

47%

LEVEL 3

44

16%

LEVEL 4

29

11%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

162
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 422

LEVEL 1

111

26%

LEVEL 2

149

35%

LEVEL 3

110

26%

LEVEL 4

52

12%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

6

67%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

8

57%

LEVEL 2

6

43%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

56
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

28

19%

LEVEL 2

67

44%

LEVEL 3

36

24%

LEVEL 4

20

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

113
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

40

17%

LEVEL 2

77

33%

LEVEL 3

75

33%

LEVEL 4

38

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

49

38%

LEVEL 2

63

49%

LEVEL 3

8

6%

LEVEL 4

9

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

49
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

79

38%

LEVEL 2

78

38%

LEVEL 3

35

17%

LEVEL 4

14

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.