AKRON CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

181
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 373

LEVEL 1

77

21%

LEVEL 2

115

31%

LEVEL 3

110

29%

LEVEL 4

71

19%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

212
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 378

LEVEL 1

57

15%

LEVEL 2

109

29%

LEVEL 3

127

34%

LEVEL 4

85

22%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

96
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

34

18%

LEVEL 2

61

32%

LEVEL 3

58

30%

LEVEL 4

38

20%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

109
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

19

10%

LEVEL 2

61

32%

LEVEL 3

67

35%

LEVEL 4

42

22%

MALE

PROFICIENT

85
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

43

24%

LEVEL 2

54

30%

LEVEL 3

52

29%

LEVEL 4

33

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

103
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

38

20%

LEVEL 2

48

25%

LEVEL 3

60

32%

LEVEL 4

43

23%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

3

43%

LEVEL 4

2

29%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

5
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

26

57%

LEVEL 2

15

33%

LEVEL 3

5

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

8
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

16

37%

LEVEL 2

19

44%

LEVEL 3

5

12%

LEVEL 4

3

7%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

176
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 320

LEVEL 1

48

15%

LEVEL 2

96

30%

LEVEL 3

105

33%

LEVEL 4

71

22%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

197
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 322

LEVEL 1

39

12%

LEVEL 2

86

27%

LEVEL 3

118

37%

LEVEL 4

79

25%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

178
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 328

LEVEL 1

39

12%

LEVEL 2

111

34%

LEVEL 3

107

33%

LEVEL 4

71

22%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

211
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 343

LEVEL 1

31

9%

LEVEL 2

101

29%

LEVEL 3

126

37%

LEVEL 4

85

25%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

38

84%

LEVEL 2

4

9%

LEVEL 3

3

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

26

74%

LEVEL 2

8

23%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

137
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

23

10%

LEVEL 2

72

31%

LEVEL 3

82

35%

LEVEL 4

55

24%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

162
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

21

8%

LEVEL 2

69

27%

LEVEL 3

91

36%

LEVEL 4

71

28%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

44
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

54

38%

LEVEL 2

43

30%

LEVEL 3

28

20%

LEVEL 4

16

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

50
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

36

29%

LEVEL 2

40

32%

LEVEL 3

36

29%

LEVEL 4

14

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.