HAMBURG CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

377
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 628

LEVEL 1

67

11%

LEVEL 2

184

29%

LEVEL 3

191

30%

LEVEL 4

186

30%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

414
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 683

LEVEL 1

71

10%

LEVEL 2

198

29%

LEVEL 3

236

35%

LEVEL 4

178

26%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

189
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

31

10%

LEVEL 2

98

31%

LEVEL 3

97

31%

LEVEL 4

92

29%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

190
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 325

LEVEL 1

30

9%

LEVEL 2

105

32%

LEVEL 3

115

35%

LEVEL 4

75

23%

MALE

PROFICIENT

188
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

36

12%

LEVEL 2

86

28%

LEVEL 3

94

30%

LEVEL 4

94

30%

MALE

PROFICIENT

224
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 358

LEVEL 1

41

11%

LEVEL 2

93

26%

LEVEL 3

121

34%

LEVEL 4

103

29%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

14
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

1

6%

LEVEL 2

2

12%

LEVEL 3

8

47%

LEVEL 4

6

35%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

12
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

1

6%

LEVEL 2

4

24%

LEVEL 3

7

41%

LEVEL 4

5

29%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

348
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 581

LEVEL 1

58

10%

LEVEL 2

175

30%

LEVEL 3

173

30%

LEVEL 4

175

30%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

389
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 634

LEVEL 1

64

10%

LEVEL 2

181

29%

LEVEL 3

220

35%

LEVEL 4

169

27%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

4

50%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

6

33%

LEVEL 2

5

28%

LEVEL 3

3

17%

LEVEL 4

4

22%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

3

16%

LEVEL 2

6

32%

LEVEL 3

7

37%

LEVEL 4

3

16%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

367
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 555

LEVEL 1

28

5%

LEVEL 2

160

29%

LEVEL 3

187

34%

LEVEL 4

180

32%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

396
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 592

LEVEL 1

27

5%

LEVEL 2

169

29%

LEVEL 3

222

38%

LEVEL 4

174

29%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

39

53%

LEVEL 2

24

33%

LEVEL 3

4

5%

LEVEL 4

6

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

18
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

44

48%

LEVEL 2

29

32%

LEVEL 3

14

15%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

326
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 508

LEVEL 1

38

7%

LEVEL 2

144

28%

LEVEL 3

163

32%

LEVEL 4

163

32%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

353
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 550

LEVEL 1

37

7%

LEVEL 2

160

29%

LEVEL 3

195

35%

LEVEL 4

158

29%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

51
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

29

24%

LEVEL 2

40

33%

LEVEL 3

28

23%

LEVEL 4

23

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

61
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

34

26%

LEVEL 2

38

29%

LEVEL 3

41

31%

LEVEL 4

20

15%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.