Skip to Content
Main content

ALDEN CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

174
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 369

LEVEL 1

60

16%

LEVEL 2

135

37%

LEVEL 3

101

27%

LEVEL 4

73

20%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

190
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 385

LEVEL 1

65

17%

LEVEL 2

130

34%

LEVEL 3

114

30%

LEVEL 4

76

20%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

88
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

24

14%

LEVEL 2

65

37%

LEVEL 3

50

28%

LEVEL 4

38

21%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

104
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

33

18%

LEVEL 2

51

27%

LEVEL 3

61

32%

LEVEL 4

43

23%

MALE

PROFICIENT

86
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

36

19%

LEVEL 2

70

36%

LEVEL 3

51

27%

LEVEL 4

35

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

86
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

32

16%

LEVEL 2

79

40%

LEVEL 3

53

27%

LEVEL 4

33

17%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

170
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 356

LEVEL 1

56

16%

LEVEL 2

130

37%

LEVEL 3

98

28%

LEVEL 4

72

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

181
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 369

LEVEL 1

62

17%

LEVEL 2

126

34%

LEVEL 3

108

29%

LEVEL 4

73

20%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

4

80%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

174
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 322

LEVEL 1

32

10%

LEVEL 2

116

36%

LEVEL 3

101

31%

LEVEL 4

73

23%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

188
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 341

LEVEL 1

35

10%

LEVEL 2

118

35%

LEVEL 3

112

33%

LEVEL 4

76

22%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

28

60%

LEVEL 2

19

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

30

68%

LEVEL 2

12

27%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

137
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

37

14%

LEVEL 2

92

35%

LEVEL 3

79

30%

LEVEL 4

58

22%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

150
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

42

15%

LEVEL 2

92

32%

LEVEL 3

85

30%

LEVEL 4

65

23%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

37
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

23

22%

LEVEL 2

43

42%

LEVEL 3

22

21%

LEVEL 4

15

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

40
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

23

23%

LEVEL 2

38

38%

LEVEL 3

29

29%

LEVEL 4

11

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.