HOMER JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

71
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

97

33%

LEVEL 2

127

43%

LEVEL 3

51

17%

LEVEL 4

20

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

76
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

96

31%

LEVEL 2

141

45%

LEVEL 3

54

17%

LEVEL 4

22

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

34
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

43

30%

LEVEL 2

64

45%

LEVEL 3

26

18%

LEVEL 4

8

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

38
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

41

30%

LEVEL 2

59

43%

LEVEL 3

26

19%

LEVEL 4

12

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

37
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

54

35%

LEVEL 2

63

41%

LEVEL 3

25

16%

LEVEL 4

12

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

38
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

55

31%

LEVEL 2

82

47%

LEVEL 3

28

16%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

67
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

92

32%

LEVEL 2

125

44%

LEVEL 3

49

17%

LEVEL 4

18

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

73
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 304

LEVEL 1

93

31%

LEVEL 2

138

45%

LEVEL 3

53

17%

LEVEL 4

20

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

69
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

71

28%

LEVEL 2

118

46%

LEVEL 3

49

19%

LEVEL 4

20

8%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

75
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

64

23%

LEVEL 2

135

49%

LEVEL 3

53

19%

LEVEL 4

22

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

26

70%

LEVEL 2

9

24%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

32

82%

LEVEL 2

6

15%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

53
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

36

21%

LEVEL 2

80

47%

LEVEL 3

37

22%

LEVEL 4

16

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

56
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

40

21%

LEVEL 2

93

49%

LEVEL 3

40

21%

LEVEL 4

16

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

18
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

61

48%

LEVEL 2

47

37%

LEVEL 3

14

11%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

56

45%

LEVEL 2

48

39%

LEVEL 3

14

11%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.