Skip to Content
Main content

TACONIC HILLS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

123
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

81

26%

LEVEL 2

111

35%

LEVEL 3

82

26%

LEVEL 4

41

13%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

136
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 354

LEVEL 1

108

31%

LEVEL 2

110

31%

LEVEL 3

86

24%

LEVEL 4

50

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

57
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

38

26%

LEVEL 2

51

35%

LEVEL 3

40

27%

LEVEL 4

17

12%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

67
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

55

32%

LEVEL 2

50

29%

LEVEL 3

45

26%

LEVEL 4

22

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

66
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

43

25%

LEVEL 2

60

36%

LEVEL 3

42

25%

LEVEL 4

24

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

69
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

53

29%

LEVEL 2

60

33%

LEVEL 3

41

23%

LEVEL 4

28

15%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

4

25%

LEVEL 2

7

44%

LEVEL 3

5

31%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

4

20%

LEVEL 2

10

50%

LEVEL 3

6

30%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

104
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

66

26%

LEVEL 2

85

33%

LEVEL 3

65

25%

LEVEL 4

39

15%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

109
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

86

31%

LEVEL 2

82

30%

LEVEL 3

65

23%

LEVEL 4

44

16%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

14
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

8

22%

LEVEL 2

15

41%

LEVEL 3

12

32%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

20
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

15

32%

LEVEL 2

12

26%

LEVEL 3

14

30%

LEVEL 4

6

13%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

120
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

49

18%

LEVEL 2

103

38%

LEVEL 3

79

29%

LEVEL 4

41

15%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

132
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 308

LEVEL 1

73

24%

LEVEL 2

103

33%

LEVEL 3

82

27%

LEVEL 4

50

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

32

74%

LEVEL 2

8

19%

LEVEL 3

3

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

35

76%

LEVEL 2

7

15%

LEVEL 3

4

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

136
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 349

LEVEL 1

104

30%

LEVEL 2

109

31%

LEVEL 3

86

25%

LEVEL 4

50

14%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

4

80%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

78
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

17

13%

LEVEL 2

36

27%

LEVEL 3

45

34%

LEVEL 4

33

25%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

75
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

18

14%

LEVEL 2

34

27%

LEVEL 3

37

29%

LEVEL 4

38

30%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

45
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

64

35%

LEVEL 2

75

41%

LEVEL 3

37

20%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

61
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

90

40%

LEVEL 2

76

33%

LEVEL 3

49

22%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.