Skip to Content
Main content

SARANAC CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

120
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 348

LEVEL 1

111

32%

LEVEL 2

117

34%

LEVEL 3

87

25%

LEVEL 4

33

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

127
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 369

LEVEL 1

110

30%

LEVEL 2

132

36%

LEVEL 3

74

20%

LEVEL 4

53

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

46
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

61

37%

LEVEL 2

56

34%

LEVEL 3

33

20%

LEVEL 4

13

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

54
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

45

27%

LEVEL 2

67

40%

LEVEL 3

36

22%

LEVEL 4

18

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

74
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

50

27%

LEVEL 2

61

33%

LEVEL 3

54

29%

LEVEL 4

20

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

73
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

65

32%

LEVEL 2

65

32%

LEVEL 3

38

19%

LEVEL 4

35

17%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

117
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 341

LEVEL 1

109

32%

LEVEL 2

115

34%

LEVEL 3

85

25%

LEVEL 4

32

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

121
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 354

LEVEL 1

106

30%

LEVEL 2

127

36%

LEVEL 3

70

20%

LEVEL 4

51

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

29%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

117
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

80

26%

LEVEL 2

108

35%

LEVEL 3

84

28%

LEVEL 4

33

11%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

127
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

67

21%

LEVEL 2

124

39%

LEVEL 3

74

23%

LEVEL 4

53

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

31

72%

LEVEL 2

9

21%

LEVEL 3

3

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

43

84%

LEVEL 2

8

16%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

89
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

45

23%

LEVEL 2

65

33%

LEVEL 3

64

32%

LEVEL 4

25

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

93
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

40

19%

LEVEL 2

76

36%

LEVEL 3

53

25%

LEVEL 4

40

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

66

44%

LEVEL 2

52

35%

LEVEL 3

23

15%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

34
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

70

44%

LEVEL 2

56

35%

LEVEL 3

21

13%

LEVEL 4

13

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.