Skip to Content
Main content

BEEKMANTOWN MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

44
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

99

41%

LEVEL 2

98

41%

LEVEL 3

35

15%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

53
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

129

48%

LEVEL 2

85

32%

LEVEL 3

41

15%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

25
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

39

33%

LEVEL 2

56

47%

LEVEL 3

20

17%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

21
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

58

46%

LEVEL 2

47

37%

LEVEL 3

17

13%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

19
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

60

50%

LEVEL 2

42

35%

LEVEL 3

15

12%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

32
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

71

50%

LEVEL 2

38

27%

LEVEL 3

24

17%

LEVEL 4

8

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

44
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

95

41%

LEVEL 2

94

40%

LEVEL 3

35

15%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

51
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

125

48%

LEVEL 2

82

32%

LEVEL 3

39

15%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

44
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

64

32%

LEVEL 2

95

47%

LEVEL 3

35

17%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

53
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

89

40%

LEVEL 2

82

37%

LEVEL 3

41

18%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

35

92%

LEVEL 2

3

8%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

40

93%

LEVEL 2

3

7%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

30
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

41

35%

LEVEL 2

46

39%

LEVEL 3

23

20%

LEVEL 4

7

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

38

31%

LEVEL 2

46

38%

LEVEL 3

27

22%

LEVEL 4

11

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

14
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

58

47%

LEVEL 2

52

42%

LEVEL 3

12

10%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

15
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

91

63%

LEVEL 2

39

27%

LEVEL 3

14

10%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.