GREENE CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

146
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

46

15%

LEVEL 2

106

36%

LEVEL 3

87

29%

LEVEL 4

59

20%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

169
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 332

LEVEL 1

63

19%

LEVEL 2

100

30%

LEVEL 3

117

35%

LEVEL 4

52

16%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

70
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

24

15%

LEVEL 2

66

41%

LEVEL 3

49

31%

LEVEL 4

21

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

88
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

29

17%

LEVEL 2

54

32%

LEVEL 3

59

35%

LEVEL 4

29

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

76
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

22

16%

LEVEL 2

40

29%

LEVEL 3

38

28%

LEVEL 4

38

28%

MALE

PROFICIENT

81
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

34

21%

LEVEL 2

46

29%

LEVEL 3

58

36%

LEVEL 4

23

14%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

139
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

42

15%

LEVEL 2

100

36%

LEVEL 3

82

29%

LEVEL 4

57

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

163
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

56

18%

LEVEL 2

96

30%

LEVEL 3

112

36%

LEVEL 4

51

16%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

3

27%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

5

50%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

138
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

20

8%

LEVEL 2

89

36%

LEVEL 3

81

33%

LEVEL 4

57

23%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

160
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

23

9%

LEVEL 2

85

32%

LEVEL 3

109

41%

LEVEL 4

51

19%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

26

51%

LEVEL 2

17

33%

LEVEL 3

6

12%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

40

63%

LEVEL 2

15

23%

LEVEL 3

8

13%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

83
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

20

13%

LEVEL 2

49

32%

LEVEL 3

44

29%

LEVEL 4

39

26%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

99
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

14

9%

LEVEL 2

38

25%

LEVEL 3

60

40%

LEVEL 4

39

26%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

63
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

26

18%

LEVEL 2

57

39%

LEVEL 3

43

29%

LEVEL 4

20

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

70
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

49

27%

LEVEL 2

62

34%

LEVEL 3

57

31%

LEVEL 4

13

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.