Skip to Content
Main content

GEORGE WASHINGTON MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

59
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 465

LEVEL 1

276

59%

LEVEL 2

130

28%

LEVEL 3

40

9%

LEVEL 4

19

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

55
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 426

LEVEL 1

256

60%

LEVEL 2

115

27%

LEVEL 3

39

9%

LEVEL 4

16

4%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

27
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

132

59%

LEVEL 2

65

29%

LEVEL 3

17

8%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

27
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

121

58%

LEVEL 2

60

29%

LEVEL 3

17

8%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

32
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

144

60%

LEVEL 2

65

27%

LEVEL 3

23

10%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

28
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

135

62%

LEVEL 2

55

25%

LEVEL 3

22

10%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

44

69%

LEVEL 2

15

23%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

8
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

42

64%

LEVEL 2

16

24%

LEVEL 3

8

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

47
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

134

51%

LEVEL 2

81

31%

LEVEL 3

30

11%

LEVEL 4

17

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

41
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

119

52%

LEVEL 2

68

30%

LEVEL 3

27

12%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

17

81%

LEVEL 2

4

19%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

17

85%

LEVEL 2

2

10%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

75

67%

LEVEL 2

30

27%

LEVEL 3

7

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

75

71%

LEVEL 2

26

25%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

59
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 410

LEVEL 1

225

55%

LEVEL 2

126

31%

LEVEL 3

40

10%

LEVEL 4

19

5%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

55
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 356

LEVEL 1

189

53%

LEVEL 2

112

31%

LEVEL 3

39

11%

LEVEL 4

16

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

51

93%

LEVEL 2

4

7%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

67

96%

LEVEL 2

3

4%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

31

33%

LEVEL 2

34

37%

LEVEL 3

18

19%

LEVEL 4

10

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

31

36%

LEVEL 2

28

32%

LEVEL 3

18

21%

LEVEL 4

10

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 372

LEVEL 1

245

66%

LEVEL 2

96

26%

LEVEL 3

22

6%

LEVEL 4

9

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 339

LEVEL 1

225

66%

LEVEL 2

87

26%

LEVEL 3

21

6%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.