Skip to Content
Main content

GOWANDA CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

115
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 436

LEVEL 1

154

35%

LEVEL 2

167

38%

LEVEL 3

81

19%

LEVEL 4

34

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

95
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 456

LEVEL 1

189

41%

LEVEL 2

172

38%

LEVEL 3

66

14%

LEVEL 4

29

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

58
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

69

35%

LEVEL 2

71

36%

LEVEL 3

39

20%

LEVEL 4

19

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

47
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

79

37%

LEVEL 2

88

41%

LEVEL 3

34

16%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

57
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

85

36%

LEVEL 2

96

40%

LEVEL 3

42

18%

LEVEL 4

15

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

48
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

110

45%

LEVEL 2

84

35%

LEVEL 3

32

13%

LEVEL 4

16

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

10
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

11

28%

LEVEL 2

19

48%

LEVEL 3

6

15%

LEVEL 4

4

10%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

8
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

13

31%

LEVEL 2

21

50%

LEVEL 3

6

14%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

12
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

61

59%

LEVEL 2

30

29%

LEVEL 3

9

9%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

12
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

65

61%

LEVEL 2

30

28%

LEVEL 3

10

9%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

87
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

72

27%

LEVEL 2

112

41%

LEVEL 3

61

23%

LEVEL 4

26

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

72
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

97

35%

LEVEL 2

112

40%

LEVEL 3

47

17%

LEVEL 4

25

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

112
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 370

LEVEL 1

104

28%

LEVEL 2

154

42%

LEVEL 3

80

22%

LEVEL 4

32

9%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

92
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 380

LEVEL 1

135

36%

LEVEL 2

153

40%

LEVEL 3

64

17%

LEVEL 4

28

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

50

76%

LEVEL 2

13

20%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

54

71%

LEVEL 2

19

25%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

57
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

37

24%

LEVEL 2

61

39%

LEVEL 3

40

26%

LEVEL 4

17

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

40
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

41

29%

LEVEL 2

62

43%

LEVEL 3

26

18%

LEVEL 4

14

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

58
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

117

42%

LEVEL 2

106

38%

LEVEL 3

41

15%

LEVEL 4

17

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

55
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

148

47%

LEVEL 2

110

35%

LEVEL 3

40

13%

LEVEL 4

15

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.