Skip to Content
Main content

CATTARAUGUS-LITTLE VALLEY CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

94
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

88

28%

LEVEL 2

132

42%

LEVEL 3

62

20%

LEVEL 4

32

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

111
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

86

28%

LEVEL 2

114

37%

LEVEL 3

72

23%

LEVEL 4

39

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

44
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

35

24%

LEVEL 2

68

46%

LEVEL 3

31

21%

LEVEL 4

13

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

50
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

39

28%

LEVEL 2

50

36%

LEVEL 3

28

20%

LEVEL 4

22

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

50
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

53

32%

LEVEL 2

64

38%

LEVEL 3

31

19%

LEVEL 4

19

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

61
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

47

27%

LEVEL 2

64

37%

LEVEL 3

44

26%

LEVEL 4

17

10%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

5

63%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

92
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

83

28%

LEVEL 2

121

41%

LEVEL 3

62

21%

LEVEL 4

30

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

106
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

81

28%

LEVEL 2

105

36%

LEVEL 3

67

23%

LEVEL 4

39

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

3

50%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

90
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

53

20%

LEVEL 2

116

45%

LEVEL 3

59

23%

LEVEL 4

31

12%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

108
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

55

21%

LEVEL 2

98

38%

LEVEL 3

70

27%

LEVEL 4

38

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

35

64%

LEVEL 2

16

29%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

31

62%

LEVEL 2

16

32%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

53
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

24

17%

LEVEL 2

61

44%

LEVEL 3

36

26%

LEVEL 4

17

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

65
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

29

20%

LEVEL 2

48

34%

LEVEL 3

42

30%

LEVEL 4

23

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

64

36%

LEVEL 2

71

40%

LEVEL 3

26

15%

LEVEL 4

15

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

46
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

57

34%

LEVEL 2

66

39%

LEVEL 3

30

18%

LEVEL 4

16

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.