ALLEGANY-LIMESTONE CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

173
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 473

LEVEL 1

129

27%

LEVEL 2

171

36%

LEVEL 3

105

22%

LEVEL 4

68

14%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

184
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 443

LEVEL 1

102

23%

LEVEL 2

157

35%

LEVEL 3

106

24%

LEVEL 4

78

18%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

86
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

60

26%

LEVEL 2

84

37%

LEVEL 3

54

23%

LEVEL 4

32

14%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

88
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

59

26%

LEVEL 2

77

34%

LEVEL 3

47

21%

LEVEL 4

41

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

87
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

69

28%

LEVEL 2

87

36%

LEVEL 3

51

21%

LEVEL 4

36

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

96
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

43

20%

LEVEL 2

80

37%

LEVEL 3

59

27%

LEVEL 4

37

17%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

4

29%

LEVEL 2

4

29%

LEVEL 3

6

43%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

3

20%

LEVEL 2

8

53%

LEVEL 3

3

20%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

2

29%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

162
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 443

LEVEL 1

119

27%

LEVEL 2

162

37%

LEVEL 3

96

22%

LEVEL 4

66

15%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

177
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 417

LEVEL 1

93

22%

LEVEL 2

147

35%

LEVEL 3

102

24%

LEVEL 4

75

18%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

5

83%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

170
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 412

LEVEL 1

82

20%

LEVEL 2

160

39%

LEVEL 3

103

25%

LEVEL 4

67

16%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

179
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 398

LEVEL 1

70

18%

LEVEL 2

149

37%

LEVEL 3

103

26%

LEVEL 4

76

19%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

47

77%

LEVEL 2

11

18%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

32

71%

LEVEL 2

8

18%

LEVEL 3

3

7%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

130
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

60

21%

LEVEL 2

95

33%

LEVEL 3

80

28%

LEVEL 4

50

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

145
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

42

15%

LEVEL 2

91

33%

LEVEL 3

81

29%

LEVEL 4

64

23%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

69

37%

LEVEL 2

76

40%

LEVEL 3

25

13%

LEVEL 4

18

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

39
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

60

36%

LEVEL 2

66

40%

LEVEL 3

25

15%

LEVEL 4

14

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.