Skip to Content
Main content

TIOUGHNIOGA RIVERSIDE ACADEMY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

143
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 388

LEVEL 1

112

29%

LEVEL 2

133

34%

LEVEL 3

91

23%

LEVEL 4

52

13%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

151
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 398

LEVEL 1

112

28%

LEVEL 2

135

34%

LEVEL 3

99

25%

LEVEL 4

52

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

70
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

58

30%

LEVEL 2

67

34%

LEVEL 3

39

20%

LEVEL 4

31

16%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

73
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

51

26%

LEVEL 2

76

38%

LEVEL 3

42

21%

LEVEL 4

31

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

73
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

54

28%

LEVEL 2

66

34%

LEVEL 3

52

27%

LEVEL 4

21

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

78
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

61

31%

LEVEL 2

59

30%

LEVEL 3

57

29%

LEVEL 4

21

11%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

4

57%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

141
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 373

LEVEL 1

106

28%

LEVEL 2

126

34%

LEVEL 3

89

24%

LEVEL 4

52

14%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

149
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 384

LEVEL 1

104

27%

LEVEL 2

131

34%

LEVEL 3

98

26%

LEVEL 4

51

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

139
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 332

LEVEL 1

68

20%

LEVEL 2

125

38%

LEVEL 3

89

27%

LEVEL 4

50

15%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

146
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 334

LEVEL 1

65

19%

LEVEL 2

123

37%

LEVEL 3

95

28%

LEVEL 4

51

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

44

79%

LEVEL 2

8

14%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

47

73%

LEVEL 2

12

19%

LEVEL 3

4

6%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

73
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

19

14%

LEVEL 2

45

33%

LEVEL 3

40

29%

LEVEL 4

33

24%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

86
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

22

15%

LEVEL 2

41

28%

LEVEL 3

48

32%

LEVEL 4

38

26%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

70
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

93

37%

LEVEL 2

88

35%

LEVEL 3

51

20%

LEVEL 4

19

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

65
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

90

36%

LEVEL 2

94

38%

LEVEL 3

51

20%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.