CHENANGO FORKS CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

191
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 561

LEVEL 1

156

28%

LEVEL 2

214

38%

LEVEL 3

127

23%

LEVEL 4

64

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

226
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 578

LEVEL 1

150

26%

LEVEL 2

202

35%

LEVEL 3

147

25%

LEVEL 4

79

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

82
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

75

28%

LEVEL 2

113

42%

LEVEL 3

54

20%

LEVEL 4

28

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

93
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

75

29%

LEVEL 2

95

36%

LEVEL 3

61

23%

LEVEL 4

32

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

109
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

81

28%

LEVEL 2

101

35%

LEVEL 3

73

25%

LEVEL 4

36

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

133
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

75

24%

LEVEL 2

107

34%

LEVEL 3

86

27%

LEVEL 4

47

15%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

6

43%

LEVEL 2

5

36%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

2

14%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

6

35%

LEVEL 2

7

41%

LEVEL 3

3

18%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

179
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 520

LEVEL 1

138

27%

LEVEL 2

203

39%

LEVEL 3

122

23%

LEVEL 4

57

11%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

214
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 530

LEVEL 1

131

25%

LEVEL 2

185

35%

LEVEL 3

141

27%

LEVEL 4

73

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

8

50%

LEVEL 2

2

13%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

4

25%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

8

38%

LEVEL 2

7

33%

LEVEL 3

3

14%

LEVEL 4

3

14%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

187
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 490

LEVEL 1

96

20%

LEVEL 2

207

42%

LEVEL 3

124

25%

LEVEL 4

63

13%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

223
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 505

LEVEL 1

91

18%

LEVEL 2

191

38%

LEVEL 3

145

29%

LEVEL 4

78

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

60

85%

LEVEL 2

7

10%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

59

81%

LEVEL 2

11

15%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

141
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 325

LEVEL 1

66

20%

LEVEL 2

118

36%

LEVEL 3

91

28%

LEVEL 4

50

15%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

156
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 324

LEVEL 1

60

19%

LEVEL 2

108

33%

LEVEL 3

99

31%

LEVEL 4

57

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

50
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

90

38%

LEVEL 2

96

41%

LEVEL 3

36

15%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

70
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

90

35%

LEVEL 2

94

37%

LEVEL 3

48

19%

LEVEL 4

22

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.