ALTMAR-PARISH-WILLIAMSTOWN CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

151
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 481

LEVEL 1

170

35%

LEVEL 2

160

33%

LEVEL 3

85

18%

LEVEL 4

66

14%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

133
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 461

LEVEL 1

168

36%

LEVEL 2

160

35%

LEVEL 3

95

21%

LEVEL 4

38

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

84
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

82

33%

LEVEL 2

85

34%

LEVEL 3

50

20%

LEVEL 4

34

14%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

71
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

76

33%

LEVEL 2

85

37%

LEVEL 3

51

22%

LEVEL 4

20

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

67
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

88

38%

LEVEL 2

75

33%

LEVEL 3

35

15%

LEVEL 4

32

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

62
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

92

40%

LEVEL 2

75

33%

LEVEL 3

44

19%

LEVEL 4

18

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

145
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 458

LEVEL 1

161

35%

LEVEL 2

152

33%

LEVEL 3

81

18%

LEVEL 4

64

14%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

127
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 440

LEVEL 1

159

36%

LEVEL 2

154

35%

LEVEL 3

89

20%

LEVEL 4

38

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

3

33%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

2

22%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

4

50%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

148
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 398

LEVEL 1

99

25%

LEVEL 2

151

38%

LEVEL 3

83

21%

LEVEL 4

65

16%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

129
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 380

LEVEL 1

100

26%

LEVEL 2

151

40%

LEVEL 3

92

24%

LEVEL 4

37

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

71

86%

LEVEL 2

9

11%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

68

84%

LEVEL 2

9

11%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

80
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

40

24%

LEVEL 2

48

29%

LEVEL 3

37

22%

LEVEL 4

43

26%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

62
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

42

27%

LEVEL 2

54

34%

LEVEL 3

41

26%

LEVEL 4

21

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

71
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

130

42%

LEVEL 2

112

36%

LEVEL 3

48

15%

LEVEL 4

23

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

71
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

126

42%

LEVEL 2

106

35%

LEVEL 3

54

18%

LEVEL 4

17

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.