BRONX CHARTER SCH-EXCELLENCE GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

346
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 499

LEVEL 1

27

5%

LEVEL 2

126

25%

LEVEL 3

159

32%

LEVEL 4

187

37%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

303
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 535

LEVEL 1

67

13%

LEVEL 2

165

31%

LEVEL 3

149

28%

LEVEL 4

154

29%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

175
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

14

6%

LEVEL 2

64

25%

LEVEL 3

82

32%

LEVEL 4

93

37%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

160
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

33

12%

LEVEL 2

73

27%

LEVEL 3

81

30%

LEVEL 4

79

30%

MALE

PROFICIENT

171
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

13

5%

LEVEL 2

62

25%

LEVEL 3

77

31%

LEVEL 4

94

38%

MALE

PROFICIENT

143
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

34

13%

LEVEL 2

92

34%

LEVEL 3

68

25%

LEVEL 4

75

28%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

148
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

11

5%

LEVEL 2

63

28%

LEVEL 3

77

35%

LEVEL 4

71

32%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

122
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

30

13%

LEVEL 2

75

33%

LEVEL 3

65

29%

LEVEL 4

57

25%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

102
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

12

7%

LEVEL 2

54

32%

LEVEL 3

54

32%

LEVEL 4

48

29%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

83
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

32

17%

LEVEL 2

70

38%

LEVEL 3

47

25%

LEVEL 4

36

19%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

326
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 446

LEVEL 1

22

5%

LEVEL 2

98

22%

LEVEL 3

148

33%

LEVEL 4

178

40%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

287
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 481

LEVEL 1

45

9%

LEVEL 2

149

31%

LEVEL 3

143

30%

LEVEL 4

144

30%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

20
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

5

9%

LEVEL 2

28

53%

LEVEL 3

11

21%

LEVEL 4

9

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

16
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

22

41%

LEVEL 2

16

30%

LEVEL 3

6

11%

LEVEL 4

10

19%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

336
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 479

LEVEL 1

26

5%

LEVEL 2

117

24%

LEVEL 3

152

32%

LEVEL 4

184

38%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

294
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 515

LEVEL 1

63

12%

LEVEL 2

158

31%

LEVEL 3

143

28%

LEVEL 4

151

29%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

10
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

9

45%

LEVEL 3

7

35%

LEVEL 4

3

15%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

9
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

4

20%

LEVEL 2

7

35%

LEVEL 3

6

30%

LEVEL 4

3

15%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

93
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

11

8%

LEVEL 2

29

22%

LEVEL 3

43

32%

LEVEL 4

50

38%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

68
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

12

9%

LEVEL 2

51

39%

LEVEL 3

34

26%

LEVEL 4

34

26%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

253
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 366

LEVEL 1

16

4%

LEVEL 2

97

27%

LEVEL 3

116

32%

LEVEL 4

137

37%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

235
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 404

LEVEL 1

55

14%

LEVEL 2

114

28%

LEVEL 3

115

28%

LEVEL 4

120

30%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.