TAG YOUNG SCHOLARS GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

305
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 326

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

20

6%

LEVEL 3

63

19%

LEVEL 4

242

74%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

307
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 320

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

13

4%

LEVEL 3

54

17%

LEVEL 4

253

79%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

148
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

13

8%

LEVEL 3

36

22%

LEVEL 4

112

69%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

148
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

3%

LEVEL 3

32

21%

LEVEL 4

116

76%

MALE

PROFICIENT

157
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

7

4%

LEVEL 3

27

16%

LEVEL 4

130

79%

MALE

PROFICIENT

159
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

8

5%

LEVEL 3

22

13%

LEVEL 4

137

82%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

120
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

1%

LEVEL 3

13

11%

LEVEL 4

107

88%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

121
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

2%

LEVEL 3

6

5%

LEVEL 4

115

93%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

38
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

3%

LEVEL 3

3

8%

LEVEL 4

35

90%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

43
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

7%

LEVEL 4

40

93%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

63
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

12

16%

LEVEL 3

22

29%

LEVEL 4

41

55%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

56
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

8%

LEVEL 3

20

33%

LEVEL 4

36

59%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

64
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

6

8%

LEVEL 3

22

31%

LEVEL 4

42

59%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

61
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

9%

LEVEL 3

24

36%

LEVEL 4

37

55%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

301
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 320

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

19

6%

LEVEL 3

62

19%

LEVEL 4

239

75%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

303
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

12

4%

LEVEL 3

51

16%

LEVEL 4

252

80%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

3

50%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

3

60%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

144
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

8

5%

LEVEL 3

22

14%

LEVEL 4

122

80%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

169
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

3%

LEVEL 3

26

15%

LEVEL 4

143

82%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

161
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

12

7%

LEVEL 3

41

24%

LEVEL 4

120

69%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

138
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

8

5%

LEVEL 3

28

19%

LEVEL 4

110

75%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.