ACHIEVEMENT FIRST CROWN HEIGHTS GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

329
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 535

LEVEL 1

43

8%

LEVEL 2

163

30%

LEVEL 3

182

34%

LEVEL 4

147

27%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

355
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 551

LEVEL 1

54

10%

LEVEL 2

142

26%

LEVEL 3

196

36%

LEVEL 4

159

29%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

171
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

18

6%

LEVEL 2

91

33%

LEVEL 3

99

35%

LEVEL 4

72

26%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

178
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

16

6%

LEVEL 2

80

29%

LEVEL 3

92

34%

LEVEL 4

86

31%

MALE

PROFICIENT

158
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

25

10%

LEVEL 2

72

28%

LEVEL 3

83

33%

LEVEL 4

75

29%

MALE

PROFICIENT

177
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

38

14%

LEVEL 2

62

22%

LEVEL 3

104

38%

LEVEL 4

73

26%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

317
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 517

LEVEL 1

41

8%

LEVEL 2

159

31%

LEVEL 3

175

34%

LEVEL 4

142

27%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

344
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 531

LEVEL 1

50

9%

LEVEL 2

137

26%

LEVEL 3

190

36%

LEVEL 4

154

29%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

2

14%

LEVEL 2

4

29%

LEVEL 3

6

43%

LEVEL 4

2

14%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

304
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 465

LEVEL 1

22

5%

LEVEL 2

139

30%

LEVEL 3

163

35%

LEVEL 4

141

30%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

320
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 463

LEVEL 1

27

6%

LEVEL 2

116

25%

LEVEL 3

173

37%

LEVEL 4

147

32%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

25
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

21

30%

LEVEL 2

24

34%

LEVEL 3

19

27%

LEVEL 4

6

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

35
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

27

31%

LEVEL 2

26

30%

LEVEL 3

23

26%

LEVEL 4

12

14%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

98
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

10

7%

LEVEL 2

44

29%

LEVEL 3

53

35%

LEVEL 4

45

30%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

90
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

9

7%

LEVEL 2

23

19%

LEVEL 3

41

34%

LEVEL 4

49

40%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

231
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 383

LEVEL 1

33

9%

LEVEL 2

119

31%

LEVEL 3

129

34%

LEVEL 4

102

27%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

265
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 429

LEVEL 1

45

10%

LEVEL 2

119

28%

LEVEL 3

155

36%

LEVEL 4

110

26%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.