ACHIEVEMENT FIRST E NY CHARTER SCH GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

307
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 440

LEVEL 1

28

6%

LEVEL 2

105

24%

LEVEL 3

164

37%

LEVEL 4

143

33%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

314
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 418

LEVEL 1

17

4%

LEVEL 2

87

21%

LEVEL 3

162

39%

LEVEL 4

152

36%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

174
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

13

5%

LEVEL 2

59

24%

LEVEL 3

85

35%

LEVEL 4

89

36%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

164
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

5

2%

LEVEL 2

52

24%

LEVEL 3

77

35%

LEVEL 4

87

39%

MALE

PROFICIENT

133
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

15

8%

LEVEL 2

46

24%

LEVEL 3

79

41%

LEVEL 4

54

28%

MALE

PROFICIENT

150
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

12

6%

LEVEL 2

35

18%

LEVEL 3

85

43%

LEVEL 4

65

33%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

247
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 362

LEVEL 1

26

7%

LEVEL 2

89

25%

LEVEL 3

128

35%

LEVEL 4

119

33%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

247
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 334

LEVEL 1

16

5%

LEVEL 2

71

21%

LEVEL 3

125

37%

LEVEL 4

122

37%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

54
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

2

3%

LEVEL 2

15

21%

LEVEL 3

32

45%

LEVEL 4

22

31%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

58
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

16

21%

LEVEL 3

32

43%

LEVEL 4

26

35%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

291
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 390

LEVEL 1

10

3%

LEVEL 2

89

23%

LEVEL 3

150

38%

LEVEL 4

141

36%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

297
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 366

LEVEL 1

5

1%

LEVEL 2

64

17%

LEVEL 3

149

41%

LEVEL 4

148

40%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

16
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

18

36%

LEVEL 2

16

32%

LEVEL 3

14

28%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

17
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

12

23%

LEVEL 2

23

44%

LEVEL 3

13

25%

LEVEL 4

4

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

49
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

3

5%

LEVEL 2

10

16%

LEVEL 3

23

37%

LEVEL 4

26

42%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

47
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

12

20%

LEVEL 3

18

30%

LEVEL 4

29

48%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

258
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 378

LEVEL 1

25

7%

LEVEL 2

95

25%

LEVEL 3

141

37%

LEVEL 4

117

31%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

267
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 358

LEVEL 1

16

4%

LEVEL 2

75

21%

LEVEL 3

144

40%

LEVEL 4

123

34%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.