Skip to Content
Main content

KIPP ALBANY COMMUNITY CS GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

70
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 422

LEVEL 1

184

44%

LEVEL 2

168

40%

LEVEL 3

49

12%

LEVEL 4

21

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

85
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 422

LEVEL 1

181

43%

LEVEL 2

156

37%

LEVEL 3

61

14%

LEVEL 4

24

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

36
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

97

43%

LEVEL 2

95

42%

LEVEL 3

27

12%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

38
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

82

41%

LEVEL 2

78

39%

LEVEL 3

30

15%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

34
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

87

45%

LEVEL 2

73

38%

LEVEL 3

22

11%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

47
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

99

44%

LEVEL 2

78

35%

LEVEL 3

31

14%

LEVEL 4

16

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

67
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 388

LEVEL 1

169

44%

LEVEL 2

152

39%

LEVEL 3

47

12%

LEVEL 4

20

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

81
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 395

LEVEL 1

166

42%

LEVEL 2

148

37%

LEVEL 3

57

14%

LEVEL 4

24

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

10

40%

LEVEL 2

13

52%

LEVEL 3

2

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

12

57%

LEVEL 2

6

29%

LEVEL 3

3

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

85
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 410

LEVEL 1

172

42%

LEVEL 2

153

37%

LEVEL 3

61

15%

LEVEL 4

24

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

9

75%

LEVEL 2

3

25%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

85
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 416

LEVEL 1

176

42%

LEVEL 2

155

37%

LEVEL 3

61

15%

LEVEL 4

24

6%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

5

83%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

29
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

36

33%

LEVEL 2

45

41%

LEVEL 3

17

15%

LEVEL 4

12

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

19
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

14

25%

LEVEL 2

24

42%

LEVEL 3

12

21%

LEVEL 4

7

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 312

LEVEL 1

148

47%

LEVEL 2

123

39%

LEVEL 3

32

10%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

66
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 365

LEVEL 1

167

46%

LEVEL 2

132

36%

LEVEL 3

49

13%

LEVEL 4

17

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.