Skip to Content
Main content

LEADERSHIP PREP BEDFORD STUYVESANT GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

296
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 411

LEVEL 1

18

4%

LEVEL 2

97

24%

LEVEL 3

142

35%

LEVEL 4

154

37%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

279
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 421

LEVEL 1

29

7%

LEVEL 2

113

27%

LEVEL 3

166

39%

LEVEL 4

113

27%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

152
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

9

4%

LEVEL 2

44

21%

LEVEL 3

67

33%

LEVEL 4

85

41%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

143
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

9

4%

LEVEL 2

63

29%

LEVEL 3

81

38%

LEVEL 4

62

29%

MALE

PROFICIENT

144
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

9

4%

LEVEL 2

53

26%

LEVEL 3

75

36%

LEVEL 4

69

33%

MALE

PROFICIENT

136
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

20

10%

LEVEL 2

50

24%

LEVEL 3

85

41%

LEVEL 4

51

25%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

3

60%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

5
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

4

80%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

50%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

252
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 359

LEVEL 1

16

4%

LEVEL 2

91

25%

LEVEL 3

124

35%

LEVEL 4

128

36%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

242
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 371

LEVEL 1

26

7%

LEVEL 2

103

28%

LEVEL 3

146

39%

LEVEL 4

96

26%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

27
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

18%

LEVEL 3

10

30%

LEVEL 4

17

52%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

24
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

3

9%

LEVEL 2

7

21%

LEVEL 3

15

44%

LEVEL 4

9

26%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

282
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 370

LEVEL 1

10

3%

LEVEL 2

78

21%

LEVEL 3

131

35%

LEVEL 4

151

41%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

264
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 379

LEVEL 1

19

5%

LEVEL 2

96

25%

LEVEL 3

154

41%

LEVEL 4

110

29%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

14
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

8

20%

LEVEL 2

19

46%

LEVEL 3

11

27%

LEVEL 4

3

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

15
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

10

24%

LEVEL 2

17

40%

LEVEL 3

12

29%

LEVEL 4

3

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

64
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

7

8%

LEVEL 2

22

24%

LEVEL 3

26

28%

LEVEL 4

38

41%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

59
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

5

7%

LEVEL 2

11

15%

LEVEL 3

33

44%

LEVEL 4

26

35%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

232
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

11

3%

LEVEL 2

75

24%

LEVEL 3

116

36%

LEVEL 4

116

36%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

220
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 346

LEVEL 1

24

7%

LEVEL 2

102

29%

LEVEL 3

133

38%

LEVEL 4

87

25%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.