Skip to Content
Main content

ELMWOOD VILLAGE CS DAYS PARK GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

109
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

34

16%

LEVEL 2

73

34%

LEVEL 3

51

24%

LEVEL 4

58

27%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

124
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

36

15%

LEVEL 2

75

32%

LEVEL 3

65

28%

LEVEL 4

59

25%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

54
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

16

15%

LEVEL 2

35

33%

LEVEL 3

27

26%

LEVEL 4

27

26%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

63
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

20

18%

LEVEL 2

31

27%

LEVEL 3

34

30%

LEVEL 4

29

25%

MALE

PROFICIENT

55
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

18

16%

LEVEL 2

38

34%

LEVEL 3

24

22%

LEVEL 4

31

28%

MALE

PROFICIENT

61
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

16

13%

LEVEL 2

44

36%

LEVEL 3

31

26%

LEVEL 4

30

25%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

6

29%

LEVEL 2

8

38%

LEVEL 3

5

24%

LEVEL 4

2

10%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

8
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

6

30%

LEVEL 2

6

30%

LEVEL 3

3

15%

LEVEL 4

5

25%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

66
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

6

6%

LEVEL 2

27

27%

LEVEL 3

27

27%

LEVEL 4

39

39%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

72
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

7

7%

LEVEL 2

28

26%

LEVEL 3

31

29%

LEVEL 4

41

38%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

16
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

10

19%

LEVEL 2

26

50%

LEVEL 3

9

17%

LEVEL 4

7

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

19
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

12

21%

LEVEL 2

25

45%

LEVEL 3

15

27%

LEVEL 4

4

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

14
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

12

32%

LEVEL 2

12

32%

LEVEL 3

9

24%

LEVEL 4

5

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

19
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

10

23%

LEVEL 2

15

34%

LEVEL 3

13

30%

LEVEL 4

6

14%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

101
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

23

12%

LEVEL 2

66

35%

LEVEL 3

46

24%

LEVEL 4

55

29%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

11

42%

LEVEL 2

7

27%

LEVEL 3

5

19%

LEVEL 4

3

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

59
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

6

6%

LEVEL 2

30

32%

LEVEL 3

21

22%

LEVEL 4

38

40%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

67
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

10

10%

LEVEL 2

25

25%

LEVEL 3

29

28%

LEVEL 4

38

37%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

50
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

28

23%

LEVEL 2

43

36%

LEVEL 3

30

25%

LEVEL 4

20

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

57
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

26

20%

LEVEL 2

50

38%

LEVEL 3

36

27%

LEVEL 4

21

16%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.