ACHIEVEMENT FIRST ENDEAVOR CHARTER GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

332
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 534

LEVEL 1

43

8%

LEVEL 2

159

30%

LEVEL 3

195

37%

LEVEL 4

137

26%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

357
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 528

LEVEL 1

35

7%

LEVEL 2

136

26%

LEVEL 3

189

36%

LEVEL 4

168

32%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

181
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

20

7%

LEVEL 2

91

31%

LEVEL 3

105

36%

LEVEL 4

76

26%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

190
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

15

5%

LEVEL 2

79

28%

LEVEL 3

103

36%

LEVEL 4

87

31%

MALE

PROFICIENT

151
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

23

10%

LEVEL 2

68

28%

LEVEL 3

90

37%

LEVEL 4

61

25%

MALE

PROFICIENT

167
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

20

8%

LEVEL 2

57

23%

LEVEL 3

86

35%

LEVEL 4

81

33%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

4
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

3

60%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

294
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 480

LEVEL 1

41

9%

LEVEL 2

145

30%

LEVEL 3

174

36%

LEVEL 4

120

25%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

311
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 469

LEVEL 1

31

7%

LEVEL 2

127

27%

LEVEL 3

165

35%

LEVEL 4

146

31%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

33
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

2

4%

LEVEL 2

12

26%

LEVEL 3

19

40%

LEVEL 4

14

30%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

37
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

3

6%

LEVEL 2

9

18%

LEVEL 3

21

43%

LEVEL 4

16

33%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

305
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 442

LEVEL 1

16

4%

LEVEL 2

121

27%

LEVEL 3

183

41%

LEVEL 4

122

28%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

325
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 449

LEVEL 1

12

3%

LEVEL 2

112

25%

LEVEL 3

171

38%

LEVEL 4

154

34%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

27
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

27

29%

LEVEL 2

38

41%

LEVEL 3

12

13%

LEVEL 4

15

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

32
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

23

29%

LEVEL 2

24

30%

LEVEL 3

18

23%

LEVEL 4

14

18%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

76
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

6

5%

LEVEL 2

29

26%

LEVEL 3

33

30%

LEVEL 4

43

39%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

81
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

9

8%

LEVEL 2

26

22%

LEVEL 3

43

37%

LEVEL 4

38

33%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

256
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 423

LEVEL 1

37

9%

LEVEL 2

130

31%

LEVEL 3

162

38%

LEVEL 4

94

22%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

276
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 412

LEVEL 1

26

6%

LEVEL 2

110

27%

LEVEL 3

146

35%

LEVEL 4

130

32%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.