Skip to Content
Main content

BRONX EARLY COL ACAD-TEACH/LEARN GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

21
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

107

54%

LEVEL 2

69

35%

LEVEL 3

16

8%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

24
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

122

51%

LEVEL 2

92

39%

LEVEL 3

21

9%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

9
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

52

55%

LEVEL 2

33

35%

LEVEL 3

6

6%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

12
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

54

46%

LEVEL 2

51

44%

LEVEL 3

10

9%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

12
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

55

53%

LEVEL 2

36

35%

LEVEL 3

10

10%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

12
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

68

56%

LEVEL 2

41

34%

LEVEL 3

11

9%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

31

54%

LEVEL 2

21

37%

LEVEL 3

4

7%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

14
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

72

54%

LEVEL 2

48

36%

LEVEL 3

12

9%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

18
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

89

51%

LEVEL 2

66

38%

LEVEL 3

16

9%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

21
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

68

45%

LEVEL 2

62

41%

LEVEL 3

16

11%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

23
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

87

44%

LEVEL 2

86

44%

LEVEL 3

20

10%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

39

85%

LEVEL 2

7

15%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

35

83%

LEVEL 2

6

14%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

21
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

71

46%

LEVEL 2

62

40%

LEVEL 3

16

10%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

24
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

91

46%

LEVEL 2

81

41%

LEVEL 3

21

11%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

36

84%

LEVEL 2

7

16%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

31

74%

LEVEL 2

11

26%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

13

48%

LEVEL 2

10

37%

LEVEL 3

2

7%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

11

41%

LEVEL 2

12

44%

LEVEL 3

3

11%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

94

55%

LEVEL 2

59

35%

LEVEL 3

14

8%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

111

53%

LEVEL 2

80

38%

LEVEL 3

18

9%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.