ARCHIMEDES ACAD-MATH, SCI, TECH GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

22
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

124

52%

LEVEL 2

91

38%

LEVEL 3

15

6%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

21
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

135

52%

LEVEL 2

105

40%

LEVEL 3

16

6%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

13
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

59

50%

LEVEL 2

47

39%

LEVEL 3

11

9%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

10
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

62

46%

LEVEL 2

62

46%

LEVEL 3

8

6%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

9
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

65

55%

LEVEL 2

44

37%

LEVEL 3

4

3%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

11
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

73

57%

LEVEL 2

43

34%

LEVEL 3

8

6%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

43

54%

LEVEL 2

30

38%

LEVEL 3

4

5%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

48

56%

LEVEL 2

35

41%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

76

56%

LEVEL 2

55

40%

LEVEL 3

4

3%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

80

54%

LEVEL 2

58

39%

LEVEL 3

7

5%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

21
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

72

40%

LEVEL 2

87

48%

LEVEL 3

15

8%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

19
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

90

44%

LEVEL 2

97

47%

LEVEL 3

15

7%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

52

91%

LEVEL 2

4

7%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

45

82%

LEVEL 2

8

15%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

22
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

106

49%

LEVEL 2

88

41%

LEVEL 3

15

7%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

21
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

118

49%

LEVEL 2

101

42%

LEVEL 3

16

7%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

18

86%

LEVEL 2

3

14%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

17

81%

LEVEL 2

4

19%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

13

35%

LEVEL 2

16

43%

LEVEL 3

6

16%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

21

53%

LEVEL 2

15

38%

LEVEL 3

3

8%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

14
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

111

56%

LEVEL 2

75

38%

LEVEL 3

9

5%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

114

52%

LEVEL 2

90

41%

LEVEL 3

13

6%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.