Skip to Content
Main content

INWOOD ACAD FOR LEADERSHIP CS GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

97
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 468

LEVEL 1

174

37%

LEVEL 2

197

42%

LEVEL 3

75

16%

LEVEL 4

22

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

97
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 438

LEVEL 1

163

37%

LEVEL 2

178

41%

LEVEL 3

74

17%

LEVEL 4

23

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

48
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

76

35%

LEVEL 2

95

43%

LEVEL 3

37

17%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

46
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

70

35%

LEVEL 2

83

42%

LEVEL 3

32

16%

LEVEL 4

14

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

49
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

98

39%

LEVEL 2

102

41%

LEVEL 3

38

15%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

51
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

93

39%

LEVEL 2

95

40%

LEVEL 3

42

18%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

11

55%

LEVEL 2

5

25%

LEVEL 3

3

15%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

89
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 442

LEVEL 1

163

37%

LEVEL 2

190

43%

LEVEL 3

72

16%

LEVEL 4

17

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

92
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 417

LEVEL 1

153

37%

LEVEL 2

172

41%

LEVEL 3

70

17%

LEVEL 4

22

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

91
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 366

LEVEL 1

104

28%

LEVEL 2

171

47%

LEVEL 3

69

19%

LEVEL 4

22

6%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

91
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 338

LEVEL 1

99

29%

LEVEL 2

148

44%

LEVEL 3

69

20%

LEVEL 4

22

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

70

69%

LEVEL 2

26

25%

LEVEL 3

6

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

64

64%

LEVEL 2

30

30%

LEVEL 3

5

5%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

95
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 388

LEVEL 1

117

30%

LEVEL 2

176

45%

LEVEL 3

73

19%

LEVEL 4

22

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

94
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 371

LEVEL 1

121

33%

LEVEL 2

156

42%

LEVEL 3

72

19%

LEVEL 4

22

6%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

57

71%

LEVEL 2

21

26%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

42

63%

LEVEL 2

22

33%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

50

38%

LEVEL 2

58

44%

LEVEL 3

18

14%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

19

25%

LEVEL 2

36

48%

LEVEL 3

17

23%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

73
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

124

37%

LEVEL 2

139

41%

LEVEL 3

57

17%

LEVEL 4

16

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

77
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 363

LEVEL 1

144

40%

LEVEL 2

142

39%

LEVEL 3

57

16%

LEVEL 4

20

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.