RIVERTON STREET CHARTER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

204
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 487

LEVEL 1

110

23%

LEVEL 2

173

36%

LEVEL 3

113

23%

LEVEL 4

91

19%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

223
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 534

LEVEL 1

134

25%

LEVEL 2

177

33%

LEVEL 3

141

26%

LEVEL 4

82

15%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

115
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

43

17%

LEVEL 2

89

36%

LEVEL 3

54

22%

LEVEL 4

61

25%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

128
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

58

21%

LEVEL 2

95

34%

LEVEL 3

76

27%

LEVEL 4

52

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

89
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

67

28%

LEVEL 2

84

35%

LEVEL 3

59

25%

LEVEL 4

30

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

95
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

76

30%

LEVEL 2

82

32%

LEVEL 3

65

26%

LEVEL 4

30

12%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

191
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 449

LEVEL 1

98

22%

LEVEL 2

160

36%

LEVEL 3

106

24%

LEVEL 4

85

19%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

204
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 489

LEVEL 1

120

25%

LEVEL 2

165

34%

LEVEL 3

127

26%

LEVEL 4

77

16%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

9

29%

LEVEL 2

10

32%

LEVEL 3

6

19%

LEVEL 4

6

19%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

18
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

12

31%

LEVEL 2

9

23%

LEVEL 3

14

36%

LEVEL 4

4

10%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

190
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 419

LEVEL 1

79

19%

LEVEL 2

150

36%

LEVEL 3

103

25%

LEVEL 4

87

21%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

212
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 456

LEVEL 1

88

19%

LEVEL 2

156

34%

LEVEL 3

136

30%

LEVEL 4

76

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

14
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

31

46%

LEVEL 2

23

34%

LEVEL 3

10

15%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

46

59%

LEVEL 2

21

27%

LEVEL 3

5

6%

LEVEL 4

6

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

12

20%

LEVEL 2

22

37%

LEVEL 3

13

22%

LEVEL 4

13

22%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

159
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 353

LEVEL 1

76

22%

LEVEL 2

118

33%

LEVEL 3

93

26%

LEVEL 4

66

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

178
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 427

LEVEL 1

98

23%

LEVEL 2

151

35%

LEVEL 3

100

23%

LEVEL 4

78

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

64
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

58

32%

LEVEL 2

59

33%

LEVEL 3

48

27%

LEVEL 4

16

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.