Skip to Content
Main content

SUCCESS ACADEMY CS-BRONX 1 GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

293
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

1%

LEVEL 3

49

17%

LEVEL 4

244

83%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

378
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 387

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

9

2%

LEVEL 3

94

24%

LEVEL 4

284

73%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

141
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

1%

LEVEL 3

26

18%

LEVEL 4

115

81%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

188
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

2%

LEVEL 3

42

22%

LEVEL 4

146

76%

MALE

PROFICIENT

152
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

1%

LEVEL 3

23

15%

LEVEL 4

129

84%

MALE

PROFICIENT

190
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

3%

LEVEL 3

52

27%

LEVEL 4

138

71%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

6

86%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

162
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

1%

LEVEL 3

35

21%

LEVEL 4

127

78%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

193
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

3%

LEVEL 3

48

24%

LEVEL 4

145

73%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

118
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

1%

LEVEL 3

12

10%

LEVEL 4

106

89%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

168
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

2%

LEVEL 3

44

26%

LEVEL 4

124

72%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

265
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

1%

LEVEL 3

38

14%

LEVEL 4

227

85%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

335
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 341

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

2%

LEVEL 3

78

23%

LEVEL 4

257

75%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

28
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

11

39%

LEVEL 4

17

61%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

43
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

7%

LEVEL 3

16

35%

LEVEL 4

27

59%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

59
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

11

19%

LEVEL 4

48

81%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

50
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

4%

LEVEL 3

9

17%

LEVEL 4

41

79%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

234
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

1%

LEVEL 3

38

16%

LEVEL 4

196

83%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

328
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 335

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

7

2%

LEVEL 3

85

25%

LEVEL 4

243

73%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.