Skip to Content
Main content

SUCCESS ACADEMY CS-BRONX 2 GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

288
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

21

7%

LEVEL 3

80

26%

LEVEL 4

208

67%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

394
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 413

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

16

4%

LEVEL 3

91

22%

LEVEL 4

303

73%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

136
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

9

6%

LEVEL 3

38

26%

LEVEL 4

98

68%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

178
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

4

2%

LEVEL 3

33

18%

LEVEL 4

145

79%

MALE

PROFICIENT

152
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

12

7%

LEVEL 3

42

25%

LEVEL 4

110

66%

MALE

PROFICIENT

216
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

12

5%

LEVEL 3

58

25%

LEVEL 4

158

69%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

4

80%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

188
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

10

5%

LEVEL 3

64

32%

LEVEL 4

124

63%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

249
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

8

3%

LEVEL 3

55

21%

LEVEL 4

194

75%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

93
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

10

10%

LEVEL 3

16

15%

LEVEL 4

77

74%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

135
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

7

5%

LEVEL 3

34

24%

LEVEL 4

101

71%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

263
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

12

4%

LEVEL 3

63

23%

LEVEL 4

200

72%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

350
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 361

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

9

2%

LEVEL 3

74

20%

LEVEL 4

276

76%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

25
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

9

26%

LEVEL 3

17

49%

LEVEL 4

8

23%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

44
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

7

13%

LEVEL 3

17

33%

LEVEL 4

27

52%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

282
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

21

7%

LEVEL 3

79

26%

LEVEL 4

203

67%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

386
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 403

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

14

3%

LEVEL 3

88

22%

LEVEL 4

298

74%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

5

83%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

8
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

3

30%

LEVEL 4

5

50%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

109
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

5

4%

LEVEL 3

22

19%

LEVEL 4

87

76%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

149
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

4

3%

LEVEL 3

30

19%

LEVEL 4

119

77%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

179
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

16

8%

LEVEL 3

58

30%

LEVEL 4

121

62%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

245
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

12

5%

LEVEL 3

61

24%

LEVEL 4

184

71%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.