ALTMAR-PARISH-WILLIAMSTOWN ELEMEN GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

124
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 337

LEVEL 1

97

29%

LEVEL 2

116

34%

LEVEL 3

65

19%

LEVEL 4

59

18%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

100
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 329

LEVEL 1

111

34%

LEVEL 2

118

36%

LEVEL 3

67

20%

LEVEL 4

33

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

63
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

46

27%

LEVEL 2

64

37%

LEVEL 3

35

20%

LEVEL 4

28

16%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

55
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

56

32%

LEVEL 2

66

37%

LEVEL 3

37

21%

LEVEL 4

18

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

61
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

51

31%

LEVEL 2

52

32%

LEVEL 3

30

18%

LEVEL 4

31

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

45
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

55

36%

LEVEL 2

52

34%

LEVEL 3

30

20%

LEVEL 4

15

10%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

118
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 317

LEVEL 1

91

29%

LEVEL 2

108

34%

LEVEL 3

61

19%

LEVEL 4

57

18%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

94
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

104

33%

LEVEL 2

115

37%

LEVEL 3

61

19%

LEVEL 4

33

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

2

25%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

4

50%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

122
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

58

20%

LEVEL 2

109

38%

LEVEL 3

64

22%

LEVEL 4

58

20%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

96
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

66

24%

LEVEL 2

112

41%

LEVEL 3

64

23%

LEVEL 4

32

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

39

81%

LEVEL 2

7

15%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

45

82%

LEVEL 2

6

11%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

67
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

19

16%

LEVEL 2

32

27%

LEVEL 3

30

25%

LEVEL 4

37

31%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

46
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

30

25%

LEVEL 2

42

36%

LEVEL 3

28

24%

LEVEL 4

18

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

57
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

78

36%

LEVEL 2

84

38%

LEVEL 3

35

16%

LEVEL 4

22

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

54
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

81

38%

LEVEL 2

76

36%

LEVEL 3

39

18%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.