Skip to Content
Main content

SUCCESS ACADEMY CS-BRONX 3 GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

84
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

3%

LEVEL 3

15

17%

LEVEL 4

69

79%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

163
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

5

3%

LEVEL 3

43

25%

LEVEL 4

120

71%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

41
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

7

17%

LEVEL 4

34

83%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

76
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

4%

LEVEL 3

15

19%

LEVEL 4

61

77%

MALE

PROFICIENT

43
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

7%

LEVEL 3

8

17%

LEVEL 4

35

76%

MALE

PROFICIENT

87
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

2

2%

LEVEL 3

28

31%

LEVEL 4

59

66%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

80
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

3

4%

LEVEL 3

27

32%

LEVEL 4

53

63%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

45
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

4%

LEVEL 3

9

19%

LEVEL 4

36

77%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

78
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

3%

LEVEL 3

16

20%

LEVEL 4

62

78%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

77
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

3%

LEVEL 3

13

16%

LEVEL 4

64

81%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

145
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

1%

LEVEL 3

37

25%

LEVEL 4

108

74%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

5

63%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

18
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

4

17%

LEVEL 3

6

26%

LEVEL 4

12

52%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

30
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

3%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

28

90%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

5%

LEVEL 3

3

14%

LEVEL 4

17

81%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

54
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

4%

LEVEL 3

13

23%

LEVEL 4

41

73%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

143
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

4

3%

LEVEL 3

40

27%

LEVEL 4

103

70%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.