Skip to Content
Main content

ALBANY COUNTY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

5,623
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 13,614

LEVEL 1

4,027

30%

LEVEL 2

3,964

29%

LEVEL 3

3,324

24%

LEVEL 4

2,299

17%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

6,452
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 14,386

LEVEL 1

4,340

30%

LEVEL 2

3,594

25%

LEVEL 3

3,699

26%

LEVEL 4

2,753

19%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

2,760
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,572

LEVEL 1

1,842

28%

LEVEL 2

1,970

30%

LEVEL 3

1,666

25%

LEVEL 4

1,094

17%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

3,189
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,027

LEVEL 1

2,060

29%

LEVEL 2

1,778

25%

LEVEL 3

1,900

27%

LEVEL 4

1,289

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

2,863
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,042

LEVEL 1

2,185

31%

LEVEL 2

1,994

28%

LEVEL 3

1,658

24%

LEVEL 4

1,205

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

3,263
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,359

LEVEL 1

2,280

31%

LEVEL 2

1,816

25%

LEVEL 3

1,799

24%

LEVEL 4

1,464

20%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

220
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 581

LEVEL 1

212

36%

LEVEL 2

149

26%

LEVEL 3

138

24%

LEVEL 4

82

14%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

300
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 745

LEVEL 1

259

35%

LEVEL 2

186

25%

LEVEL 3

165

22%

LEVEL 4

135

18%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

11
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

7

26%

LEVEL 2

9

33%

LEVEL 3

6

22%

LEVEL 4

5

19%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

12
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

11

38%

LEVEL 2

6

21%

LEVEL 3

9

31%

LEVEL 4

3

10%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

855
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,419

LEVEL 1

241

17%

LEVEL 2

323

23%

LEVEL 3

389

27%

LEVEL 4

466

33%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

935
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,462

LEVEL 1

257

18%

LEVEL 2

270

18%

LEVEL 3

396

27%

LEVEL 4

539

37%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

3,770
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,322

LEVEL 1

1,287

18%

LEVEL 2

2,265

31%

LEVEL 3

2,227

30%

LEVEL 4

1,543

21%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

4,178
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,628

LEVEL 1

1,457

19%

LEVEL 2

1,993

26%

LEVEL 3

2,379

31%

LEVEL 4

1,799

24%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

496
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,065

LEVEL 1

1,706

56%

LEVEL 2

863

28%

LEVEL 3

369

12%

LEVEL 4

127

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

677
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,196

LEVEL 1

1,721

54%

LEVEL 2

798

25%

LEVEL 3

496

16%

LEVEL 4

181

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

271
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,200

LEVEL 1

574

48%

LEVEL 2

355

30%

LEVEL 3

195

16%

LEVEL 4

76

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

350
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,326

LEVEL 1

635

48%

LEVEL 2

341

26%

LEVEL 3

254

19%

LEVEL 4

96

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

5,463
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 12,050

LEVEL 1

2,987

25%

LEVEL 2

3,600

30%

LEVEL 3

3,208

27%

LEVEL 4

2,255

19%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

6,222
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 12,659

LEVEL 1

3,176

25%

LEVEL 2

3,261

26%

LEVEL 3

3,530

28%

LEVEL 4

2,692

21%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

160
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,564

LEVEL 1

1,040

66%

LEVEL 2

364

23%

LEVEL 3

116

7%

LEVEL 4

44

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

230
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,727

LEVEL 1

1,164

67%

LEVEL 2

333

19%

LEVEL 3

169

10%

LEVEL 4

61

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

5,510
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 12,887

LEVEL 1

3,607

28%

LEVEL 2

3,770

29%

LEVEL 3

3,252

25%

LEVEL 4

2,258

18%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6,316
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 13,578

LEVEL 1

3,826

28%

LEVEL 2

3,436

25%

LEVEL 3

3,599

27%

LEVEL 4

2,717

20%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

113
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 727

LEVEL 1

420

58%

LEVEL 2

194

27%

LEVEL 3

72

10%

LEVEL 4

41

6%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

136
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 808

LEVEL 1

514

64%

LEVEL 2

158

20%

LEVEL 3

100

12%

LEVEL 4

36

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4,450
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 8,299

LEVEL 1

1,505

18%

LEVEL 2

2,344

28%

LEVEL 3

2,473

30%

LEVEL 4

1,977

24%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4,759
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,672

LEVEL 1

1,092

14%

LEVEL 2

1,821

24%

LEVEL 3

2,499

33%

LEVEL 4

2,260

29%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1,173
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,315

LEVEL 1

2,522

47%

LEVEL 2

1,620

30%

LEVEL 3

851

16%

LEVEL 4

322

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1,693
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,714

LEVEL 1

3,248

48%

LEVEL 2

1,773

26%

LEVEL 3

1,200

18%

LEVEL 4

493

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

5,622
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 13,605

LEVEL 1

4,022

30%

LEVEL 2

3,961

29%

LEVEL 3

3,323

24%

LEVEL 4

2,299

17%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

6,452
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 14,374

LEVEL 1

4,332

30%

LEVEL 2

3,590

25%

LEVEL 3

3,699

26%

LEVEL 4

2,753

19%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

1
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

5

56%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

8

67%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.